Maxiniini Makarova & Marchenko & Lindquist 2021, tribe n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maxiniini tribe n. Type genus: Maxinia Lindquist & Makarova, 2012. Diagnosis. Adult dorsal shield entire, robust, broad, without lateral incisions. Idiosomal setae simple. Female with sternal shield consolidated with endopodal sclerites between coxae I–II, and with free endopodal fragments between coxae II–III and free strongly developed strips between coxae III–IV; male sternitigenital shield fused with all endopodal sclerites beside coxae II–IV. Female with an apomorphically expansive ventrianal shield encompassing metapodal platelets anterolaterally and including setae JV 1 anteriorly. Male with sternitigenital shield abutting an expansive ventrianal shield that incorporates metapodal platelets. Peritreme slightly shortened, its margins smooth. Subcapitulum with narrow deutosternal groove; hypostomatic setae hp -1 and hp -3 not elongated and whip-like. Palp trochanter setae similar in size. Genu III with only seven setae (lacking pv -1). Male spermatodactyl short, tube-like. Tarsus I with claws. None of setae on tarsi II to IV conspicuously differentiated by shape or size. Genera included: Maxinia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.286 | 0.041 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".