Bibliographic record
Abstract
Willowsia nigromaculata (Lubbock, 1873) Figs 2–7, 10–11; Tables 2–3 Seira nigromaculata Lubbock 1873: 146, Great Britain (orig. descr.). Willowsia nigromaculata – Shoebotham 1917: 432 (comb.). — Zhang et al. 2011 (descr.). Type species Seira nigromaculata Lubbock, 1873. Diagnosis Body with pigments laterally on head to Abd III, and spots on Abd IV, femur and tibiotarsus (Fig. 2); head mac S0 absent, Ps3 mes and Ps5 mac present; sublobal plate with 2 inner appendages (Fig. 5E); Th II–Abd IV formula with 9,8|3,3,3+7,7+14 mac, p2a rarely present on Th III (Fig. 6A–C); manubrium dorsally with 7 lateral chaetae abruptly acuminate at the tip, manubrial plate with 3–4 chaetae, 1 mac (Fig. 7G–H). Material examined FRANCE • 2 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀, 1 juvenile on slides, 7 specimens in alcohol; Paris, National Museum of Natural History, Department de Systematique et Évolution; 48°50′30.0″ N, 02°21′33.1″ E; in laboratory benchtop; 1 Jun. 2016; VD Tarli leg.; INPA. Description LENGTH. Total length (head + trunk) of specimens 1.51–1.85 mm (n = 3). Specimens pale yellowish white with violet pigments on Ant II to Ant IV, head laterally, margins of Th II–Abd II, Abd III with one transverse band that expands laterally, Abd IV dorsally with one irregular lateral spot, irregular spots on dorsoventral plate and posterior border; distal half of Abd V to VI, distal femur and tibiotarsus medially; eyepatches black (Fig. 2). HEAD. Antennal ratio as I: II: III: IV = 1: 1.83–2.00 1.68–2.12: 1.81–2.36 (n = 3). Ant IV not annulated, with apical bulb bilobed and sometimes retraticle. Five interocular chaetae (q, v, p, r, t); head dorsal macrochaetotaxy (Fig. 5B) with 5 ‘An’ (An1a–3), 4 ‘A’ (A0, A2–3, A5), 3 ‘M’ (M1–2, M4), 6 ‘S’ (S2– 6), 1 ‘Ps’ (Ps5), 5 ‘Pa’ (Pa1–5), 2 ‘Pm’ (Pm1, Pm3), 5 ‘Pp’ (Pp1–5), and 2 ‘Pe’ (Pe2–3) mac; An2a?, A1, A4? mic present. Maxillary palp with t.a. smooth and b.c. weakly striated, thicker and 1.12 longer than t.a.; sublobal plate with 2 inner (sb.2–3) and 1 outer (sb.4) smooth appendages, sb.2 smaller and sb.4 minute (Fig. 5E). Ventral chaetotaxy with about 68 ciliate chaetae, 36 thin of differents sizes, 31 normal and subequal in length and 1 b.c., cephalic groove with 6 chaetae; postlabial formula with 4 (G1–4), 4 (X, X2–4), 4 (H2–4), 4 (J1–4), 2 (X’, X4’) chaetae (Fig. 5G). THORAX CHAETOTAXY (Fig. 6A). Th II, anterior collar with numerous chaetae; a, m and p series with 1 (a5), 1 (m4) and 7 (p1–5) mac, respectively. Th III, a, m and p series with 2 (a4, a6), 4 (m5–7) and 5–6 (p1–3, p5–6) mac, respectively, p2a mac rarely present; laterally numerous mes. Ratio Th II: III = 1.48–1.30: 1 (n=3). ABDOMEN CHAETOTAXY (Fig. 6B–F). Abd I, m series with 3 mac (m2–4) subequal in length. Abd II, a and m series with 1 (a2) and 3 (m3–3e, m5) mac, respectively; a5 and m2 bothriotricha with 9 and 6 accessory chaetae, respectively (Figs 3C, 6D). Abd III, a, m and p series with 3 (a2–3, a7), 4 (m3, am6, pm6, m7) and 3 (p6, p7–7i) mac, respectively; m2 bothriotrichum with 3 accessory chaetae and a5 and m5 bothriotricha with 15 accessory chaetae between them (Fig. 6E). Abd IV, A to T series with 7 mac (A3–4, A6, B4–6, C1) and E to Fe series with 14 mac (E2a–3, E4p, F1–3p, Fe3–5); T2 and T4 bothriotricha with 2 mic and 8 accessory chaetae between them (Fig. 6F); 2 sens type I (as, ps), 4 sens type II, and 13 posterior chaetae of different sizes. Abd V a, m, pa and p series with 1 (a5), 4 (m2–3, m5–5e), 1 (p6ai) and 5 (p1, p3–6) mac, respectively. Ratio Abd III: IV = 1: 3.61–4.14 (n= 3). LEGS. Subcoxa I with 3 chaetae and 2 psp; subcoxa II with an anterior row of 7 chaetae and about 16 anterior chaetae, posterior row of 3 chaetae and 2 psp; subcoxa III with one row of 7 chaetae, about 16 anterior chaetae and 2 posterior psp (Fig. 7A–C). Trochanteral organ with 12–16 spine-like chaetae (Fig. 7D). Ratio unguis: unguiculus = 1: 0.52. Tibiotarsal smooth chaeta 1.09 the length of unguiculus; tenent hairs 0.97 the length of unguis. COLLOPHORE. Anterior side with about 20 chaetae, 5 mac and 3 mes ciliate and abruptly acuminate at the tip, and 13 thin chaetae weakly ciliate; posterior side with 8 chaetae (1 unpaired) weakly ciliate and 2 distally thicker; lateral flap with 3 smooth chaetae and 9 chaetae weakly ciliate (Fig. 7F). FURCULA. Manubrium ventrally with 4 subapical chaetae of the same length and 14–16 apical chaetae, 6 inner chaetae smaller, others subequal (Figs 4C, 7I); dorsally with one lateral row of 7 ciliate chaetae abruptly acuminate at the tip, 3 mac and 4 mes (1 basal and 1 antero-subapical); manubrial plate with 3–4 ciliate chaetae of different sizes (1 mac abruptly acuminate at the tip) and 2 psp (Figs 4A–B, 7G–H). DNA Barcodes GenBank KY468311; Teillet, France (Ding et al. 2018). GenBank MG032239, MG036766, MG039377; Toronto, Canada (deWaard et al. 2019).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".