Camptochaeta multispina Mohrig & Kauschke, 2017, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Camptochaeta multispina sp. n. Fig. 4 A‒B; plate II, fig. III Locus typicus: Canada, Alberta, Munn Creek, 53.30°N, 118.10°W, spruce forest. Holotype: Male, 11.vi.‒24.vii.1994, leg. E. Fuller, Malaise trap (PWMP). Paratypes: 5 males, same data; 2 males, 23.vii.‒15.ix.1994, same location; 1 male, 30.iv.‒11.vi.1994, Canada, Alberta, Berland River at HWY 40, 53.42°N, 118.20°W, Pine forest, Malaise trap, leg. E. Fuller (PWMP, 1 male in PKHH; 1 male in MZH, 1 male in PKHH, 1 male in SDEI). Description. Male. Head. Eye bridge 3‒4 facets wide; antennae brown; 4th flagellomere with l/w-index of 3.0, haired as long as diameter, neck rather short. Palpus are 3-segmented, first segment with one bristle and a deep sensory pit. Thorax. Brown, coxae and femora paler; scutum is haired rather long and brownish; scutellum with two long bristles; mediotergite with a few hairs; posterior pronotum bare. Wings brownish; R1 = 3/4 R; c = 2/3 w; y = x; y bare; posterior wing veins distinct, without macrotrichia. Haltere are rather long, brownish. Coxae, femora and tibiae brownish; tibial organ with a large horseshoe-like patch of bristles; spurs of middle and hind tibiae equally long, somewhat longer than the apex of tibia wide; claws toothless. Abdomen. Hypopygium without an intergonocoxal lobe or bristle patch; gonocoxites haired moderately long but sparsely on the inner ventral margin; gonostylus elongate, with flat inner side; the apical tooth (paler on the base) is longer than the 5 (6) shorter spines: 2 above the tooth, 4 below, inserting separately up to the middle of gonostylus. Tegmen is wider than long, apically rounded and laterally weakly winged, with fine teeth and a short aedeagus. Body length: 2 mm. Comments. The species is characterized by elongate gonostylus with a flat inner side and an apical tooth, longer than the 5‒6 spines. It resembles Camptochaeta ofenkaulis (Lengersdorf, 1925) from Europe and Camptochaeta jeskei Mohrig & Röschmann, 1993 from Morocco (Röschmann & Mohrig 1993) by very narrow gonostylus, impressed at the inner side but differs in having 5‒6 medial spines (not 2), which are distinctly shorter than the apical tooth. Distribution. Canada (Alberta).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".