MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912647403 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4764089

Isoperla pinta Frison 1935

2011· article· en· W6912647403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLarvaButteHolotypeOrchardNuisance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isoperla pinta Frison (Figs. 2L, 14 a-h, 20 L) Isoperla pinta Frison 1937, 21:92. Holotype ♂, Floras Creek, Curry Co., Oregon. Isoperla pinta: Szczytko & Stewart 1979, 32:44-49. ♂, ♀, larva (not reared), ovum. Material examined. CALIFORNIA: Butte Co., Butte Creek, Butte Creek Ecological Reserve, Honey Run Road, 2.9 mi (4.7 km) E intersection with Skyway, 13/I/2007, 05/II/2007, 11/IX/2007, J. Sandberg, Larvae; 17/II/2007, J. Sandberg, Larvae (reared), 04/III/2007, J. Sandberg, D. Pickard, ♂ ♀ Larvae (reared); 07/IV/2007, J. Sandberg, ♂ ♀; 18/I/2008, J. Sandberg, D. Pickard, Larvae; 04/II/2008, J. Sandberg, Larvae; 30/III/2008, ♂ ♀; 27/III/2009, ♂; 03/IV/2009, ♀; 19/II/2010, J. Sandberg, S. Hassur, Larvae (reared); 22/II/2010, J. Sandberg, Larvae (reared); 11/III/2010, J. Sandberg, J. York, Larvae (reared); 14/III/2010, J. Sandberg, Larvae (reared); 27/IV/2010, R. Baumann, B. Kondratieff, J. Sandberg, ♀; El Dorado Co., Cosumnes River, Michigan Bar, 18/IV/1986, R. Bottorff, ♂ ♀ (NMNH); Humboldt Co., Mad River, Arcata Bottoms, Mad River Road, N40.91578° W124.10618°, 10/IV/2010, J. Sandberg, ♂ ♀; Monterey Co.,?, Carmel,, E. VanDuzee, 23/III/1919, ♂ relaxed in KOH (NMNH); Plumas Co., Spanish Creek, Hwy 70 bridge, Quincy Town Park, 10/III/2007, J. Sandberg, Larva; Sacramento Co., Cosumnes River, Sloughhouse, 04/IV/1982, 25/V/1982, R. Bottorff, ♀ (NMNH); Tulare Co., Lemon Creek, Near Los Angeles, 14/IV/1950, R. Usinger, ♂ ♀ (NMNH); OREGON: Benton Co.,?, Corvallis, 06/IV/1907, J. Bridwell, ♂ (NMNH); Clatsop Co., Nehalem River, at Red Bluff Road 4 mi (6.4 km) NE Elsie, 17- 18/IV/1965, S. Jewett Jr., ♀ (NMNH); Curry Co., Rogue River, Orchard Bar, Cty Hwy 595 (Agness Rd), 8.9 mi (14.3 km)NE Hwy 101, 14/II/2010, J. Sandberg, ♀, Exuviae; Rogue River, Coyote Bar, Cty Hwy 595 (Agness Rd), 5.6 mi (9.0 km) NE Hwy 101, 27/II/2010, J. Sandberg, Larvae; Douglas Co., Cow Creek, at Quines Creek, 08/IV/1968, S. Jewett Jr., ♀ (NMNH); Josephine Co?., Applegate River, Location?, 23/II/1968, S. Jewett Jr., ♀ (NMNH); Marion Co., Santiam River, Near Jefferson, 11/IV/1967, S. Jewett Jr., ♀ (NMNH). Santiam River, Boat Launch & Rest Stop, I-5 bridge, 17 mi (27.3 km) S Salem, 19/III/2007, J. Sandberg, D. Pickard, J. Slusark, ♂. Male larva. Body length of mature larva 10–13 mm. Dorsum of head with contrasting pigment pattern and fine light and dark clothing setae, anterior frontoclypeus margin unpigmented; light M shaped pattern anterior to median ocellus not typical of western Isoperla species, usually connected to light frontoclypeus area by thin median longitudinal light band, lateral arms distinctly swollen at approximately mid length, usually directed laterally, extending to above antennal bases; posterior ocelli with partially enclosed large light areas along outer lateral margins; interocellar area partially light, an irregular shape enclosed by dark brown pigment anteriorly and light brown pigment posteriorly; occiput with irregular spinulae band extending from below eye to near median epicranial suture, not enclosed completely by dark pigment (Fig. 14a). Lacinia bidentate, total length 682–841 µm (Figs. 2L, 14 e-h, Tables 2-4); submarginal row (A+B) with 4–5 setae, groups A-B interrupted by gap below subapical tooth (SAT) inner margin (Figs. 14 g-h); 1–2 submarginal setae (A) the first inserted at base of apical tooth (AT) inner margin, the second when present, located between AT and SAT inner margins, first seta half as stout at base as marginal setae (C) and longitudinal striations weak or absent, all other species first seta nearly as stout and with striations, plus 1 thin marginal seta (TMS) adjacent to AT inner margin, sometimes obstructed from view by AT or broken, and 1 dorsal seta (DS) located below SAT inner margin, partially obstructed by SAT or first submarginal setae (B) (Figs. 14 g-h); 2–3 submarginal setae (B) located past SAT inner margin (Fig. 14h); 4– 7 marginal setae (C), initially long-stout and widely spaced, last few shorter and variably spaced, blending into and difficult to differentiate from dorsal setae (Fig. 14e); 29–50 ventral surface setae (D) forming dense longitudinal band below marginal setae, ending posteriorly at approximately ¾ the inner lacinia margin length, and concentrated in posterior half (Fig. 14f); dorsal surface setae (DSS) forming dense, laterally protruding, longitudinal band on and along inner-lateral margin, ending before posterior-most ventral surface setae (Fig. 14f). Galea with 8–17 setae in sparse ventral row, apex with 4 setae. Maxillary Palp segments 2–3 with curved, apically rounded setae. Pronotum with irregular shaped median light area bordered by complex pattern of dark markings; discs each with distinctive lateral dark checkerboard pattern, fine dark and light clothing setae and lateral margins with broad light bands (Fig. 14b). Meso and metanotum with contrasting pigment pattern and fine dark and light clothing setae (Fig. 14c). Legs with numerous light and dark clothing setae and scattered erect spines on outer surface of femora, erect spines longest and concentrated along dorsal surface; fine silky setae numerous and continuous on dorsal surfaces of femora and tibia (Fig. 20L); distal femur and proximal tibia with transverse bands. Abdominal terga with three distinct longitudinal stripes and small dark spots arranged in pairs on dorsal surface and in triplets laterally; wide light median longitudinal band bisected with irregular shaped dark median stripe; lateral pair of dark longitudinal stripes about as wide as median dark stripe, not extending to lateral margins; numerous fine light clothing setae and erect spines scattered dorsally; posterior margin with scattered long and numerous short spines in a concentrated row (Fig. 14d). Distribution. Canada: British Columbia, Alberta; USA: California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Mexico: Baja California. Widely distributed throughout northern California. Diagnosis. The male larvae of I. pinta are distinct among other western Isoperla species with 2–4 submarginal setae (A+B). The 1–2 submarginal setae (A) are less than half as stout at their base than the largest marginal setae (C) and lack or possess weak longitudinal striations (Figs. 14 g-h). Remarks. The distinctive head and pronotal pigment pattern of larvae could be used alone to identify individuals of this species in California, where Isoperla phalerata Needham has not been collected. In Butte Creek, Butte County, it was the first of three Isoperla species to emerge in March–April. Specimens examined in this study were compared with I. phalerata from previous drumming studies (Sandberg 2011, Sandberg & Stewart 2006), and the adults, larvae and drumming characters could not be separated. Perhaps these are sibling species and can only be separated by very slight aedeagus character differences or Scanning Electron Microscope characters of the ovum (Szczytko & Stewart 1979 – Figs. 64-71). However, it seems likely the Colorado I. phalerata population studied in Sandberg & Stewart (2006) was actually I. pinta. Further study is needed to confirm the identity of these two very closely related species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics→French-language works237,207→