Ancylis uncella Denis and Schiffermuller 1775
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ancylis uncella (Denis and Schiffermüller, 1775) Figs. 11–16, 63–64, 77–78 Tinea uncella Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775, Syst. Verz. Schmett. Wienergegend: 136. Tortrix uncana Hübner, 1796 –1799, Samml. Eur. Schmett. 7: pl. 13, fig. 76. [unjustified emendation] Ancylis uncana var. subuncana Krulikowsky, 1907, Rev. Russe Ent. 7: 33. Ancylis carbonana Heinrich, 1923, Bull. U. S. natn. Mus. 123: 248. syn.n. Diagnosis. Most individuals of A. uncella can be diagnosed by forewing pattern: the median fascia is brown to reddish brown, complete from costa to dorsum, and flanked on the dorsum and tornus by gray patches. Some A. goodelliana can appear similar (Fig. 18), but the median fascia is not expressed on the costa in that species. Redescription. Forewing. FWL Ƌ 5–9 mm (n=30), ♀ 6–8 mm (n=14). Forewings are brown to reddish brown and gray with white to gray costal strigulae. The brown to reddish-brown median fascia is complete from costa to dorsum in most individuals; occasionally the dorsal portion is broken before reaching the dorsum (Fig. 13), but in all cases the median fascia is expressed on the costa. Gray to light gray patches are present proximal to the median fascia on the dorsum and distal to the median fascia on the tornus; often median fascia extends into the distal gray patch (Fig. 12–13, 16). In some individuals the brown and gray areas of the wing are sharply contrasting (Fig. 11), while in others the gray is darker and subdued (Fig. 14). Black streaks are sometimes weakly expressed along the radius and cubitus (Figs. 12–14). Male genitalia. The male genitalia are identical to those of A. pacificana with the exception of the phallus, which is 0.7 as long as the valva, and the tooth on the phallus, which is at the apex (and difficult to see in some preparations). As with A. pacificana, the length of the cucullus, the width of the valval neck, and the saccular terminal projections all vary between individuals; we have attempted to illustrate the range of variation in Figs. 63–64. Female genitalia. Antrum sclerotized to 0.6 length of ductus bursae, widened at ostium to 0.5 distance between apophyses anteriores. Corpus bursae large, oval, expanding abruptly from ductus bursae; signa large, blade- or horn-shaped, unequal in size. Molecular data. BIN URI: BOLD:AAA7191, BIN-sharing with A. goodelliana, with a minimum distance of 1.13%. Distribution. With the synonymy of A. carbonana, A. uncella has a Holarctic distribution. In the Palearctic, it is found from the United Kingdom and France south to Romania and east to Siberia, the Korean Peninsula, and Japan (Razowski 2003). In the Nearctic, it is present across Canada from Ontario to Manitoba and Alberta, and in the U.S. from Maine south to Pennsylvania and Virginia. Biology. Adults are present from late April to June, sometimes also in a small second generation in July and August (Razowski 2003). Larvae feed in July and August on Betula and Erica and pupate after hibernation in a cocoon spun in a dead leaf (Bradley et al. 1979). Remarks. Heinrich (1923) described A. carbonana as different from A. uncana (= A. uncella) based on darker hindwings, a fainter mid-dorsal pale patch (on the forewing), a shorter phallus, and a narrower valva. We compared the holotype and several paratypes of A. carbonana with A. uncella from Europe and found that these characters vary to the extent that they will not reliably separate individuals from Europe and North America. Further, individuals of A. uncella from Europe and A. carbonana from Canada (identified as A. carbonana, A. goodelliana, or A. uncella) clustered together in the DNA barcode analysis (Fig. 1). Based on this evidence we synonymize A. carbonana with A. uncella.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".