MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912649599 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6595610

Cephalops gracilis Ramos-Pastrana & Marques & Rafael 2022, sp. nov.

2022· article· en· W6912649599 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCephalopods and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaPedicelScapeLobeApex (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cephalops gracilis sp. nov. Figs 33–48, 107 Diagnosis. Male. Antenna with scape and pedicel brown, postpedicel yellow, slightly acute. Legs yellow, except coxae light brown. Abdomen ground color dark, tergite 1 velvety brown dorsally, light brown laterally, gray-brown pruinose; tergites 2–5 with velvety dark brown band dorsally on anterior margin; tergites 2–4 with light brown spots posterolaterally. Surstyli subsymmetrical, shorter than epandrium length, completely setose; with outer and inner margins sinuous, with tips inward directed. Apex of phallic guide stout, long, with distinct translucent lobe apically, with dorsal margin straight and ventral margin sinuous. Phallus trifid, with ducts distinctly separated, thin. Description. MALE (holotype). Body length 3 mm. Head (Figs 33–34). Eyes contiguous for 21 facets. F, EM, V (mm) = 0.5, 0.6, 0.2. Frontal triangle brown pruinose, with conspicuous brown callus. Postcranium brown, gray pruinose. Antenna (Fig. 35) with scape and pedicel brown, scape with one seta dorsally; pedicel with three setae dorsally and two longer setae ventrally; postpedicel yellow, with acute apex. LPP/WPP = 2. Thorax (Figs 34, 36). Postpronotal lobe light brown. Scutum brown, brown pruinose. Notopleuron concolorous with scutum, gray-brown pruinose. Scutellum brown, brown pruinose, with few tiny setae scattered and eight marginal inconspicuous setae. Mesopleuron and mediotergite brown, gray-brown pruinose. Wing (Fig. 37). Length 7.4 mm. LW/MWW = 2.9; LTC/LFC = 0.7. Membrane slightly brown infuscated; vein r-m located slightly after basal third of cell dm; anal lobe normal. Halter stem and knob ventrally yellow, dorsally brown. Legs (Figs 33–34). Coxae light brown; trochanters yellow; femora yellow, with short setae ventrally, tibiae yellow; tarsomeres 1–4 yellow, 5 brown; pulvilli yellow. Abdomen (Figs 33–34, 38). Ground color velvety dark, tergite 1 dorsally brown, light brown laterally, gray-brown pruinose, with four brown and long setae laterally; tergites 2–5 with dark brown band dorsally on anterior margin, with inconspicuous setae; tergites 2–4 with light brown spots posterolaterally; tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 39. Syntergosternite 8 brown, brown pruinose, shorter than length of tergite 5, with membranous area apically (Figs 38, 40). Terminalia (Figs 39–45). Epandrium light brown, surstyli yellow (Fig. 40). Surstyli (Figs 40–42) subsymmetrical, shorter than epandrium length, completely setose; with outer and inner margins sinuous, with tips inward directed (Fig. 40); right surstylus with dorsal lobe, distinct lobe apically and tip slightly downward-directed when seen in lateral view (Figs 41–42). Gonopods subsymmetrical, with rigid lobes in the inner margin (Fig. 43). Apex of phallic guide stout, long, with distinct translucent lobe apically, dorsal margin straight, and ventral margin sinuous (Fig. 44). Ejaculatory apodeme mushroom-shaped, with sinuous margins (Fig. 45). Phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts distinctly separated, thin (Fig. 44). FEMALE (Figs 46–48). Like male, differing only in the following aspects. Body length 5.5 mm. Eyes dichoptic. Frontal ommatidia larger than adjacent ones. Wing length 6.6 mm. LW/MWW = 3.4. LTC/LFC = 0.7. Ovipositor OL: 1.11 mm, PL: 0.82 mm, B: 0.43 mm; base brown, gray-brown pruinose; piercer yellow, apex shiny (Figs 47–48). Type material. HOLOTYPE. Male: COLOMBIA, Boyacá, SFF[Santuario de Fauna y Flora] Iguaque, El Níspero, Malaise, 0538’N/7331’W, 2730 m [eters], 13–18.xii.2001, P. Reina leg “M2476 (1 ♂, IAvH) (photographed specimen). PARATYPES. idem 17–21.xii.2001, “M2581 (1 ♂, LEUA); idem “M2476 (1 ♀, IAvH); idem Qda.[Quebrada] Los Mudos, 0544’N/7326’W, 27.ii–17.iii.2003, “M3563 (1 ♀, LEUA) (photographed specimen). Holotype with left wing mounted on microslide with Canada balsam. Left antenna and terminalia placed in a microvial with glycerin, both pinned along with the specimen. Etymology. From the Latin gracilis (= thin), the name refers to the shape of the ejaculatory ducts of the phallus in the male genitalia. Geographical distribution. Colombia (Boyacá) (Fig. 107). Habitat. The specimens were collected in the Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque reserve, where the vegetation is composed of cloud Andean forests of the cordillera of the Northeast region of Colombia. Taxonomic notes. Based on males and due to the shape of the phallic guide and phallus, C. gracilis sp. nov. is similar in appearance to C. nigrifrons Rafael, 1990 [see figure 109 presented by Rafael (1990)]. It differs from C. nigrifrons by having the surstyli with outer and inner margins sinuous, with tips inward-directed (Fig. 40) [versus surstyli with outer and inner margins straight in C. nigrifrons, figure 107 presented by Rafael (1990)]; right surstylus with dorsal lobe and distinct apical lobe when seen in lateral view (Figs 41–42) [versus right surstylus with margins straight when seen in lateral view, figure 108 presented by Rafael (1990)]; ejaculatory apodeme mushroom-shaped, with margins sinuous (Fig. 45) [versus ejaculatory apodeme narrowed, figure 110 presented by Rafael (1990)].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicCephalopods and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→