MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912658194 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4603405

The Torqued Horizon: Preliminary Notes on the Hypersurface of the Real

2019· article· en· W6912658194 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)AnthropocentrismHypersurfaceObject (grammar)Basis (linear algebra)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper uses Quentin Meillassoux's <em>After Finitude </em>to re-read Martin Heidegger's <em>Being and Time</em>, Jean-Paul Sartre's <em>Being and Nothingness</em>, and Jacques Derrida's <em>Voice and Phenomenon, </em>with an eye toward releasing the subject from its correlationist, anthropocentric basis in traditional readings of Heidegger's <em>dasein</em>. By beginning with Meillassoux, and with the help of Gilbert Simondon, this study resituates the <em>possibility </em>of the subject in being, as one possible movement of being, rather than as a distinct <em>power </em>over and against being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)Same topicPhenomenology and Existential PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207