Neocybaeina burnetti Bennett & Copley & Copley 2023, spec. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neocybaeina burnetti Bennett spec. nov. Figs 40–42, 84 Type material. U.S.A.: Oregon: Holotype female. Curry County, 12 miles northeast of Gold Beach, 30.ix.1959, V.D. Roth (CAS). Paratypes. Curry, 3♀, Carpenterville, 31(sic). ix.1959, V.D. Roth (CAS); 1♀, 12 mi. N of Gold Beach, 1.x.1959, V.D. Roth (AMNH). Etymology. The specific name is a patronym honouring the late blues musician, lyricist, and band leader Chester “Howling Wolf” Burnett. Diagnosis. The male of N. burnetti spec. nov. is unknown. The females of N. burnetti spec. nov. and N. xantha comb. nov. can be distinguished by, in the former, the strongly arched atrium (Figs 40–41), the copulatory ducts proceeding posterolaterally from the atrium (Figs 41–42), and the longitudinal orientation of the spermathecal stalks (Fig. 42). In the female of N. xantha comb. nov. the atrium is weakly convex (Figs 36, 38) or represented by a pair of tiny, widely separated openings (Fig. 39), the copulatory ducts proceed anterodorsally from the atrium (Figs 38–39), and the spermathecal stalks are transversely oriented (Figs 37, 39). Description. As in diagnosis and description of the genus and the diagnosis of this species.Additional descriptive characters presented here. Abdomen patterned, legs unbanded. Male: Unknown. Female: (n=5). Epigyne (Fig. 40) with a single anteriorly located atrial opening. Vulva (Figs 41–42) with very short copulatory ducts with posterior-most portion heavily sclerotized and visible ventrally through epigynal integument as two darkened areas (Fig. 40); spermathecal heads at anterior margin of spermathecae, undifferentiated from spermathecal stalks; stalks short; Bennett’s glands large, conspicuous; spermathecal bases usually visible through epigynal integument (Fig. 40) with short, slightly constricted anterior region adjacent to Bennett’s glands and elongate, oval, bulbous posterior region; fertilization ducts attached to ventral surface of posterior region of bases. Measurements (n=3). CL 1.68, 1.98, 2.00; CW 1.25, 1.45, 1.48; SL 0.95, 1.08, 1.13; SW 0.87, 0.99, 1.03. Holotype listed second. Distribution and natural history. (Fig. 84). Neocybaeina burnetti spec. nov. is known only from a small area of Curry County in coastal southwestern Oregon, U.S.A. The conservation status of this species is unknown: all specimens were collected during a 2–3 day period in late September and early October 1959 and apparently no specimens have been collected subsequently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".