Hippoglossoides elassodon Jordan & Gilbert 1880
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hippoglossoides elassodon Jordan & Gilbert, 1880. Flathead Sole. To 52 cm (20.5 in) TL (Fadeev 1987). Northern Sea of Japan, Sea of Okhotsk, Kuril Islands, south-eastern Kamchatka, and western and eastern Bering Sea, northward to East Siberian, Chukchi, and Beaufort seas, and eastward to Bathurst Inlet, south of Dease Strait (68°20’N, 107°41’W), Nunavut (Mecklenburg et al. 2016), and Bering Sea, and Commander–Aleutian Chain to Monterey, central California (Allen and Smith 1988); one record from near La Jolla (32°55.2’N, 117°17.6’W), southern California (NWFSC-FRAM). Benthic; depth: intertidal to 1,050 m (3,445 ft) (min.: Kussakin et al. 1997; max.: Allen and Smith 1988). These data include records from Hippoglossoides robustus Gill & Townsend, 1897, considered a junior synonym by us based on data in Mecklenburg et al. (2018). However, recently also as H. robustus (Alfonso in Coad and Reist 2018, Saveliev et al. 2019, Forster et al. 2020).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".