Diploneis nana Jovanovska & Wilson & Hamilton & Stone 2023, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diploneis nana sp. nov. (LM Figs 299–319, SEM Figs 320–322) Valves are weakly asymmetric, linear-elliptic to elliptic with weakly convex margins and slightly acute apices (Figs 299–320). Valve length is 17.5–32.5 μm and valve width is 8.5–11.5 μm. The axial area is very narrow, linear to lanceolate, widening into a slightly longitudinally elongate to indistinguishable and weakly asymmetric central area (Figs 300, 320, 322), 1.5–2.7 μm wide. Externally, the canal is linear to lanceolate, slightly expanded in the middle of the valve with two (rarely three) rows of cribrate (9–15 poroids) areolae narrowing into one at the valve apices (Fig. 320). Internally, a thick non-porous slightly raised silica plate encloses the longitudinal canal (Fig. 321). Externally, the raphe is filiform, curved with strongly deflected and expanded proximal ends. The proximal raphe ends are positioned within an elongated surface depression (Fig. 322). The distal raphe ends are unilaterally bent to the same side and extend onto the mantle (Fig. 320). Internally, the raphe branches are slightly arched with simple proximal and distal ends that are slightly elevated in a depression formed by the longitudinal canal (Fig. 321). The striae are parallel at mid-valve becoming radiate towards the apices, 11–13 in 10 μm. Striae are uniseriate throughout (Figs 320, 322). The striae are composed of round areolae covered externally with fine pored cribra (20–33 poroids), 20 in 10 μm. The inter-areolar thickenings have scattered fin-like silica ridges serrated with ca. 4–5 notched edges. The areolae increase in size towards the valve margins (Fig. 320). Internally, the alveoli open via a single elongated opening covered with a thin silica layer (Fig. 321). Type:— UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, Lake Tanganyika, Mahale National Park, at 780 m elevation; sand, 30 m water depth, collected SCUBA diving, 6°10’25.1” S 29°44’25.2” E, W. Salzburger, 28 th June 2019 (holotype designated here, circled specimen BM-108996! = Fig. 306, isotypes ANSP-GC17225!, CANA-129317!). Type material CANA-129317. Registration: http://phycobank.org/103715 Pictures of the isolated specimen:— LM micrograph on 1000× magnification (Fig. S3w). Sequence data:— Plastid gene rbc L sequence (GenBank accession: OQ 660277). Etymology:— The specific epithet ‘ nana ’ or dwarf highlights relatively small size of this taxon among Diploneis species in Lake Tanganyika. Ecology and distribution:— This species has only been observed in Lake Tanganyika in the three sub-basins on the Tanzanian and Zambian sides. Despite its small size, this species is never abundant in the alkaline, moderately mineral-rich and highly transparent lake. It is typically found on sandy substrates (sometimes with mollusk shells) or submerged rocks between 9 and 36 m water depth. It is mainly found in Mahale National Park, but also in Kiganza Bay in the north and in Isanga Bay, Mutondwe Island, and Cape Nangu at Kasaba Bay in the south. The small species usually occurs together with D. kilhamiana sp. nov., D. cocquytiana sp. nov., D. salzburgeri sp. nov., D. disjuncta sp. nov., D. clara sp. nov., D. serrulata sp. nov., and D. cristata sp. nov. Main differential characters:— Valve size and shape, central area, external fin-like ornamentations across the valve, and recessed areolae over the canals. Similar species:— Diploneis disjuncta sp. nov. and Diploneis nevrovae Lange-Bertalot & Fuhrmann (2020: 89).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".