Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tetracis crocallata Guenée (Figs. 12–15, 87, 102, 118, 133) Tetracis crocallata Guenée, A., [1858] in Boisduval, J. B. A. de & Guenée, A., Histoire naturelle des insectes. Species général des lépidoptères, Paris, vol. 9:141. Syntype (s), Amérique septentrionale [North America]. Location of type (s) unknown. T. aspilatata Guenée, A., [1858] in Boisduval, J. B. A. de & Guenée, A., Histoire naturelle des insectes. Species général des lépidoptères, Paris, vol. 9:141. Synonomy by Forbes, 1948:107. This is the pale spring form of crocallata (Forbes, 1948:107). Syntypes 1 ♂, 1 ♀, [USA], New York, Canada. Location of syntypes unknown. Diagnosis: Recognized by yellow or yellowish-white wings, DFW straight transverse brown PM line, absent AM line, small brown discal spot. Description: Adults (Figs. 12–15): FWL: 17–25 mm. Antenna (stated as serrate by some authors) basically filiform in both sexes, but in males ventrally minutely setose and weakly fasciculate; ventrally minutely setose in females. Palpi, upcurved, short (about to horizontal midline of eye), yellowish-tan scales on outer side, paler inward. Head, thorax, abdomen, legs, wings concolorous varying across individuals from pale yellowish-white to yellow, with sparse sprinkling of individual brown scales; tarsal spines brown. Wings: DFW yellow or yellowish-white with straight brown transverse PM line from apex to inner margin and brown discal spot; DHW usually with brown discal spot and normally incomplete (sometimes absent) brown transverse median line. Underside as above, but less strongly marked. April specimens from Alabama are often irrorated with dark scales. Kimball (1965, p. 189) mentioned similar maculation in Florida specimens. Male genitalia (Figs. 87, 102): Uncus decurved, slender, tapering to pointed apex. Gnathos with pair of upcuved spines projecting from dorso-caudal margin. Robust club-like furca from middle of anellus with approximately 90° bend about one-third distance below rounded apex. Valve of nearly constant width with rounded apex lacking an apical projection. Aedeagus with ring of widely-spaced spinules at posterior end at base of vesica; everted vesica balloon-like with central dense patch of slender spinules. Female genitalia (Fig. 118): A/P = 0.55. Short, linearly sclerotized ductus bursae expands downward to join spherical upper portion of unsclerotized corpus bursae; lower half of corpus bursae tapers to elongate tube ending in rounded fundus. Large irregular elongate slightly spinose signum situated on upper portion of corpus bursae. Material examined: Numerous specimens, number not recorded; four dissections in addition to examination of genitalic illustrations in the literature. Biology: Life history by Forbes (1948) and McGuffin (1987:85). Recorded larval hosts include Alnus, Castanea, and Salix. Adults May—August, depending upon locality. Two generations in New York [and southward], late May and August (Forbes, 1948:107). A generalist regarding ecozones. Distribution (Fig. 133): Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, southern Manitoba, southern Saskatchewan, to Alberta (Edmonton–Red Deer region), south to northern Florida, west to Kansas, Nebraska, North Dakota, and extreme eastern Texas. Specific state/county/province records are: CANADA: MANITOBA. Porcupine Forest Reserve. NOVA SCOTIA. Kings Co. QUEBEC. Numerous localities across southern Quebec were cited by Handfield (1999). UNITED STATES: ALABAMA. Bibb, Dekalb, Jackson, Madison, Monroe. ARKANSAS. Clark, Garland. CONNECTICUT. Litchfield, New Haven. FLORIDA. Alachua, Gasden, Liberty, Suwanee. GEORGIA. Bartow, Douglas, Emanuel, Floyd, Fulton, Gilmer, Lumpkin, Paulding, Telfair, Whitfield. INDIANA. Elkhart, Lagrange, St. Joseph. ILLINOIS. Cook, Decatur, IOWA. Story, Woodbury. KANSAS. Cherokee, Douglas. KENTUCKY. Laurel. LOUISIANA (Parishes). Ascension, Iberville, St. Tammany, West Feliciana. MAINE. Franklin, Piscataquis, Penobscot. MICHIGAN. Barry, Calhoun, Cheboygan, Chippewa, Keweenaw, Otsego. MARYLAND. Alleghany, Baltimore, Caroline, Dorchester, Harford, Prince George's, Talbot, Wicomico, Worchester. MASSACHUSETTS. Middlesex. MINNESOTA. Anoka, Clearwater, Hubbard, Lake. MISSISSIPPI. Forest, George, Grenada, Lee, Pike, Rankin, Tishomingo, Warren, Wilkinson, Winston. MISSOURI. Clay, Jackson. NEBRASKA. Lancaster. NEW HAMPSHIRE. Sullivan. NEW JERSEY. Burlington, Essex, Morris, Passaic. NEW YORK. Albany, Bronx, Erie, Kings, Monroe, Orleans, Richmond (Staten Is.), Suffolk, Tompkins, Warren. NORTH CAROLINA. Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Durham, Haywood, Macon, Stokes, Swain. OHIO. Athens, Butler, Cuyahoga, Erie, Geauga, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Hocking, Holmes, Jefferson, Lake, Lawrence, Licking, Lucas, Mahoning, Montgomery, Pike, Portage, Preble, Richland, Seneca, Trumbull, Vinton, Wayne. PENNSYLVANIA. Beaver, Bucks, Centre, York. SOUTH CAROLINA. Charleston, Greenville, Pickens. SOUTH DAKOTA. Day, Marshall. TENNESSEE. Blount, Cocke, Sevier. TEXAS. Hardin, Morris, Sabine. VERMONT. Chittenden. VIRGINIA. Montgomery, Rockingham. WISCONSIN. Ashland, Brown, Burnett, Chippewa, Crawford, Dane, Douglas, Florence, Fon du Lac, Forest, Grant, Jackson, Jefferson, Juneau, Marathon, Marinette, Milwaukee, Monroe, Ozaukee, Pierce, Richland, Sauk, Sheboygan, Trempealeau, Vernon, Walworth, Washington, Waushara.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".