MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912680547 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6726752

Rheomys raptor Goldman 1912

2017· article· en· W6912680547 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesDorsal finDorsumPredationRange (aeronautics)Fish <Actinopterygii>STREAMSHome rangeFood habits

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

349. Goldman's Water Mouse Rheomys raptor French: Ichthyomys de Goldman / German: Goldman-Wassermaus / Spanish: Raton de agua de Goldman Other common names: Goldman's Ichthyomyine Taxonomy. Rheomys raptor Goldman, 1912, “near head of Rio Limon (altitude 4500 feet [= 1372 m]), Mount Pirri (= Cerro Pirre), eastern Panama.” Two subspecies are recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. R.r.raptorGoldman,1912—EPanama. R. r. hartmanni Enders, 1938 — Pacific slopes of highlands in Costa Rica and W Panama; a recently collected specimen is from a Caribbean lowland locality. Descriptive notes. Head—body 92-133 mm, tail 83-119 mm, ear 8-11 mm, hindfoot 24-29 mm. No specific data are available for body weight. Goldman’s Water Mouse is small species of Rheomys, characterized by short and fine fur. Ears are relatively large and hindfoot is relatively small compared with other species of Rheomys. Dorsum is uniformly mixed black and cinnamon,very finely grizzled, and venter is palesilvery gray. Pelage is iridescent in sunlight. Vibrissae are grayish. Tail is unicolored, not thickly haired, and white-tipped. Habitat. Always associated with clear, rocky bottomed streams bordered by dense highland cloud forest on steep valley slopes. Food and Feeding. Stomachs of two Goldman’s Water Mice contained caddisfly larvae, beetles, and spiders. Trapped individuals had strong fishy odors, and small fish were abundant in the stream where they were caught. Breeding. No information. Activity patterns. Goldman’s Water Mice are active day and night, and are semi-aquatic. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Goldman’s Water Mice are strong swimmers, capable of moving rapidly against water current. They occupy burrows with tunnels extending c.2 m; entrances are above waterline on banks of streams. A captive Goldman’s Water Mouse was highly vocal and made loud, low-frequency clicking calls by snapping its tongue against roof of its mouth. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Goldman's Water Mouse presumably has a large overall population, occurs in protected areas, and is unlikely to be declining at the rate required to qualify for a threatened category. Bibliography. Durden & Timm (2001), Enders (1938), Goldman (1912b, 1920), Hooper (1968b), Reid (2009), Reid & Langtimm (1993), Reid & Woodman (2008a), Rodriguez-Herrera et al. (2014), Timm & LaVal (2000), Voss (1988).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207