MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912681852 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5626965

Truttaedacnitis truttae (Fabricius, 1794) Petter 1974

2016· article· en· W6912681852 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcretory systemSuckerCuticle (hair)Aperture (computer memory)Ring (chemistry)Sponge spicule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

** Truttaedacnitis truttae (Fabricius, 1794) Petter, 1974 Synonyms: Bulbodacnitis globosa (Zeder, 1800) Lane, 1916; Bulbodacnitis occidentalis Smedley, 1933; Bulbodacnitis truttae (Fabricius, 1794) Maggenti, 1971; Bulbodacnitis alpinus Mudry and McCart, 1974; Truttaedacnitis alpinus (Mudry and McCart, 1974) Pybus, Uhazy and Anderson, 1978 Description (after Berland 1970, and Mudry & McCart 1974). With characteristics of the genus. Medium sized worms, cuticle moderately thick, minutely striated throughout. Head bulbous, inclined dorsally. Oral aperture bordered by cuticular collarette bearing about 100 small conspicuous “teeth”. Six cephalic papillae surround oral aperture. Pseudobuccal cavity with cephalic plates (Fig. 86 A). Excretory pore about midway between nerve ring and oesophago-intestinal junction. Deirids located anterior to excretory pore. Tail conical, bearing button-shaped or nipple-shaped mucron (North American material) or pointed mucron (European material). Males: 8.37–15.27 long; maximum width 0.25–0.42. Nerve ring 0.374–0.537, and excretory pore 0.584–0.931 from anterior end. Oesophagus clavate, 0.928–1.341 long. Single testis 0.36–2.04 from oesophagus base. Posterior lip of pre-cloacal sucker 0.836–1.251 from tail tip. Spicules equal, 0.455–0.537 long, not overlapping pre-cloacal sucker when fully retracted. Arrangement of caudal papillae similar to that of T. clitellarius above (Fig. 87 B). Gubernaculum 0.107–0.134 long. Females: 11.81–18.00 long; maximum width 0.27–0.42. Nerve ring 0.421–0.523, and excretory pore 0.612– 0.877 from anterior end. Oesophagus clavate, 1.049–1.375 long. Posterior ovary extends into tail region. Vulva raised, located 7.482–11.080 from anterior end (Fig. 90). Eggs 0.044–0.054 x 0.062–0.083. Larvae: the variety of hosts from which Truttaedacnitis truttae has been recovered and the extra-alimentary tract sites occupied (see below) suggest that larvae are present, though none appears to have been described in litt. Sites: alimentary tract, gills, gonads, intestinal lumen, kidneys, liver, mesenteries, pyloric caeca Hosts: Coregonus clupeaformis (13); Oncorhynchus clarkii (2); Oncorhynchus mykiss (1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 19); Oncorhynchus nerka (10, 13); Petromyzon marinus (3, 4); Prosopium cylindraceum (2); Prosopium williamsoni (2, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 18); Ptychocheilus oregonensis (10, 13); Salvelinus alpinus (5, 6); Salvelinus fontinalis (2, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19); Salvelinus malma (2, 8, 10, 11, 13, 19); Salvelinus namaycush (7, 8, 11, 13, 19) Distribution: Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Ontario, Yukon Territory Records: 1. Smedley 1933 (BC); 2. Bangham & Adams 1954 (BC); 3. Wilson 1967 (ON); 4. Wilson & Ronald 1967 (ON); 5. Mudry & McCart 1974 (YT); 6. Mudry & McCart 1976 (YT); 7. Mudry & Anderson 1977 (AB); 8. Anon. 1978 (BC); 9. Russell 1980 (BC); 10. Anon. 1981 (BC); 11. Arai & Mudry 1983 (BC); 12. Dunn et al. 1983 (BC); 13. Anon. 1984 (BC); 14. Frimeth 1986 (NB); 15. Frimeth 1987a (NB); 16. Frimeth 1987b (NB); 17. Marcogliese & Cone 1991a (NB); 18. Nener et al. 1995 (BC); 19. Choudhury & Dick 1996b (BC, NB, YT)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicParasite Biology and Host Interactions→French-language works237,207→