MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912696013 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6723156

Pseudostictoporella Ross 1970

2022· article· en· W6912696013 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusSection (typography)ReticulateType speciesType (biology)Hexagonal crystal system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Pseudostictoporella Ross, 1970 TYPE SPECIES. — Pseudostictoporella typicalis Ross, 1970 by original designation. Rockland Formation, Selby Member (P. bicornis Biozone), Sandbian, Ordovician; Ontario, Canada and New York, United States. DIAGNOSIS. — Colonies bifoliate, bifurcating. Autozooecia subelliptical in cross section in the endozone; irregularly hexagonal in cross section in exozone; partly separated by exilazooecia. Autozooecial diaphragms rare to absent. Hemisepta absent. Pustules common along autozooecial boundaries, scattered in exozonal walls. Metazooecia polygonal to irregularly subcircular, arranged in groups, singly or in short rows. Monticules common, generally flat; consisting of metazooecia, few autozooecia and some skeletal material. OCCURRENCE. — Sandbian, Upper Ordovician; Canada, United States, Argentina. COMPARISON The genus Pseudostictoporella Ross, 1970 differs from the genus Stictoporella Ulrich 1882 by the absence of hemisepta, from the genera Oanduella Männil, 1958 and Stictoporellina Nekhoroshev, 1956 – by bifurcating colony shape instead of reticulate one in the latter genera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→