MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912720779 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6522460

Cimbrochrysa major Makarkin & Antell & Archibald 2022, sp. nov.

2022· article· en· W6912720779 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeParatypeType localityThorax (insect anatomy)GenusSternum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cimbrochrysa major sp. nov. Figs 10–13 Type material. Female holotype FLFO 9819 a, b (part and counterpart), collected by Florissant National Monument staff in 2014; a nearly incomplete, well-preserved specimen in ventral aspect. Male paratype FLFO 4194a, b (part and counterpart), collected by Dan Riner in 1999; a complete specimen in lateral aspect with all four wings overlapping. Type locality and horizon. USA: Colorado: Teller County: Florissant: Lower Shale unit of Evanoff et al. 2001 (precise collecting locality unknown); Eocene, late Priabonian; Florissant Formation. Etymology. From the Latin, magnus, - a, - um (comparative major), meaning “large (larger)”. Diagnosis. May be distinguished from other species of the genus by ≥10 branches of RP [C. americana sp. nov.: <10], and M forked clearly distad origin of RP [C. moleriensis: at level of origin of RP]. Description. Holotype FLFO 9819. Female. Body 11.5 mm long. Head poorly preserved in ventral aspect; eyes 0.7 mm in diameter. Antennae incompletely preserved; scapus relatively large, 0.4 mm wide in ventral view. Thorax poorly preserved. Legs covered with dense, short setae. Abdomen relatively well preserved. Spermatheca appears small; spermathecal duct stout basally, pointed apically. Gonogoxites 9 elongate, wide in lateral view. Forewing ca. 16.5–17 mm long, 6.2 mm wide (length to width ratio ca. 2.66–2.74). Costal space moderately broad, most dilated rather far proximad origin of RP. Subcostal veinlets simple; rather widely spaced proximad pterostigmal region, very densely spaced in pterostigmal region. Pterostigma indistinct. Sc long (apical part not preserved). Subcostal space narrow, distally appears broadened; subcostal crossveins not detected. RA ending on margin before wing apex; its veinlets not preserved. RA space moderately broad, apparently with 15 crossveins. RP originating relatively far from wing base (at ca. 0.24 of complete length). Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, apically closely approaching RA, with 15 branches (right wing), all forked once except two distal (right wing). Basal crossvein between R, M (1r-m) long, connecting RP, MA within im near fork of M. M dividing to MA, MP markedly distad origin of RP. MA forked distad Psc. MP zigzagged, deeply forked at Psc. Crossvein 1im relatively short. Im wide (length/width ratio 2.67–2.73), pentagonal. Psm relatively well developed, zigzagged. Crossvein 2m-cu nearly in middle of im (slightly in proximal portion). CuA probably with three simple branches. CuA continuing as welldeveloped Psc. CuP deeply forked, branches rather closely spaced; c1: c2 length ratio 0.48: 1 in left wing. A1, A2 arched, simple. A3 shallowly forked. Crossvein between A1, A2 rather long; crossvein between A2, A3 very long, oblique. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner series clearly sigmoid, with 14 crossveins distad MA; outer series slightly sigmoid, with 13 crossveins distad RP2. Hind wing ca. 15.5 mm long, 4.9 mm wide. Costal space narrow. Preserved subcostal veinlets simple, widely spaced proximad pterostigmal region, dense in pterostigmal region. Pterostigma indistinct. Sc long. Subcostal space narrow, distally appears broadened; subcostal crossveins not detected. RA probably entering margin before wing apex; its veinlets not preserved. RA space relatively narrow proximally, gradually narrowing distad; with 13 crossveins. Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, with once forked 13 branches (three distal-most incompletely preserved). Proximal parts of RP, MA fused with each other for rather long distance. Psm well developed, slightly zigzagged. M dividing to MA, MP slightly distad origin of RP. Basal MA evenly curved; forked distad Psc. MP deeply forked at Psc. Proximal crossvein between MA, MP (1im) long. CuA fused with MP for short distance; pectinate, with two simple branches arising from CuA before fusion with MP. CuP deeply forked. Crossvein 2icu relatively short. A1, A2 incompletely preserved, apparently simple. Psc poorly developed, formed by MP, MA, basal branches of RP, connecting crossveins; continues to outer gradate series. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner clearly sigmoid, with 10 crossveins distad MA (crossvein between MA, RP1 lost (these veins approaching), between RP1, RP2 extremely short); outer slightly sigmoid, with 11 crossveins distad RP1. Paratype FLFO 4194. Male. Body ca. 12.5 mm long. Head poorly preserved; eye ca. 0.7 mm in diameter; details of mouthparts not discernible. Antennae complete, nearly as long a forewing (ca. 15 mm long); scapus large, slightly elongate; pedicellus as long as wide (diameter); flagellum narrowed apically. Thorax poorly preserved. Legs relatively well preserved; covered with dense, short setae. Abdomen. Ectoproct probable short. 5th–7th sternites elongate, high in lateral view. 8th sternite shorter, lower; 9th sternite narrowed apically, with obtuse apex. 8th, 9th sternites appear fused, with suture between them clearly visible. Forewing 15 mm long, 5.4 mm wide (length to width ratio 2.78). Costal space moderately broad, widest rather far proximad origin of RP. Subcostal veinlets simple; rather widely spaced proximad pterostigmal region, not preserved distad. Pterostigma indistinct. Distal part of Sc not preserved. Subcostal space relatively broad; basal subcostal crossvein slightly proximad origin olf RP. Apical part of RA not preserved. RA space moderately broad, with 13 crossveins. RP originating relatively far from wing base (at ca. 0.21 of complete length). Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, with 13 branches (left wing), once forked except three distal. Basal crossvein between R, M (1r-m) long, connecting RP, MA within im at proximal one-fifth. M dividing to MA, MP markedly distad origin of RP. MA forked distad Psc. MP zigzagged, deeply forked at Psc. Crossvein 1im relatively long. Im wide (length/width ratio 2.50), pentagonal. Psm relatively poorly developed, zigzagged. Crossvein 2m-cu nearly in middle of im. CuA probably with three simple branches. CuA continuing as well-developed Psc. CuP deeply forked; c1: c2 length ratio 0.49: 1 in right wing. A1, A2 arched, simple. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner series sigmoid, with 12 crossveins distad MA; outer series slightly sigmoid, with 11 crossveins distad RP2 (right wing). Hind wing ca. 14 mm long, 4.5 mm wide. Costal space, subcostal veinlets, Sc, subcostal space not discernible. RA partially preserved; its veinlets not discernible. RA space relatively narrow; with 10 preserved crossveins. Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, with 12 branches, mostly forked once (three distal-most possibly simple, but incompletely preserved). Proximal parts of RP, MA fused for rather long distance. Psm well developed, zigzagged. MA forked distad Psc. MP deeply forked at Psc. Proximal crossvein between MA, MP (1im) long. CuA, MP fused for short distance (right wing), not fused (left wing); pectinate, with two simple branches arising from CuA before fusion with MP (right wing). CuP deeply forked. Crossvein 2icu short. A1, A2 incompletely preserved, simple. Psc poorly developed, formed by MP, MA, basal branches of RP, connecting crossveins; continues to outer gradate series. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner clearly sigmoid, with 11 crossveins distad MA (crossvein between MA, RP1 very short); outer slightly sigmoid, with 10 crossveins distad RP1. Remarks. Specimen FLFO 4194 was reported as a lacewing by Lahmers (2011: p. 7, Fig. 1), and as ‘Chrysopidae’ by Penney & Jepson (2014: Fig. 87). The venation of the holotype and paratype differs in many small details, but we consider these intraspecific variation. For example, in the paratype forewing, 1r-m is located slightly more distally and 2m-cu is markedly shorter, and in the holotype forewing, the inner gradate series of crossveins is arranged in a more broken line.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→