Indoquedius bicoloris Smetana 2014, syn. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoquedius bicoloris Smetana, 2014 syn. nov. Type material Paratypes CHINA – Yunnan Province • 1 ♂; “ Indoquedius bicoloris A. Smetana 2013 [printed yellow label]”; Pu’er Pref., Ailao Shan, 37 km NW Jingdong; 24°45′12″ N, 100°41′24.5″ E; alt. 2300 m; 13. Oct. 2009; D. Wrase leg.; devastated forest remnant, litter/moss/grass roots sifted; ASC • 1 ♂; “ Indoquedius bicoloris A. Smetana 2013 [printed yellow label]”; Dai Bai Nat. Aut. Pref., Diancang Shan, 3 km W Dali old town, pine forest at Cloud Road, right upper chair-lift station; 25°41.1′ N, 100°6.8′ E; alt. 2650– 2750 m; 1 Sep. 2003; D. Wrase leg.; needleleaf litter; ASC • 1 ♀; “ Indoquedius bicoloris A. Smetana 2013 [printed yellow label]”; E slope N Gaoligongshan; 27°45′27.1″ N, 98° 35′ 34.5″ E; 2 Jun. 2010; alt. 2600 m; V. Grebennikov; sifting; ASC. Redescription The species has been recently redescribed and diagnosed in detail by Smetana (2017a) under the name I. bicoloris. This description is supplemented here only by the comments above and Figs 1D–E, 7B. Distribution This widespread, potentially common species is known from medium elevations in northern Myanmar, and Yunnan and Sichuan, China (Smetana 2017 a, 2017b). Bionomics Indoquedius parallelicollis appears to be tolerant to human disturbance and has been collected in a haystack and plant debris in a ruderal habitat (Smetana 2014, 2017a; Yan et al. 2017). Other specimens have been collected in a mixed forest by sifting litter, twigs and roots (Smetana 2015) Remarks The type series of I. parallelicollis includes one male and one female (Fig. 1D). The male was dissected to reveal an aedeagus identical to the color polymorphic species I. bicoloris. The current distribution of I. bicoloris includes the narrow part of Yunnan, China, west of the Salween River (Smetana 2014) and not far from Kambaiti Pass in Myanmar. Therefore I. bicoloris syn. nov., becomes a junior synonym of I. parallelicollis. The female holotype of I. sanguinipennis (Fig. 1E) corresponds perfectly (coloration of legs and abdomen, elytral punctation) with a female paratype (ASC) of the red elytra morph of I. bicoloris. Female tergite X was also consistent with that of I. bicoloris and the paratype of I. parallelicollis, including the deep emargination (Fig. 7B). Therefore, along with I. bicoloris, I. sanguinipennis syn. nov., becomes a junior synonym of I. paralellicollis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".