Stenus persculpturatus Puthz 2012, nov.sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stenus persculpturatus nov.sp. (Figs 29, 57) Type material: Holotype () and 7, 2 - paratypes: Taiwan: Pingtung Hsien: Peitawushan, Kuai-Ku Hut, 2325m, 21.V.1991, A. Smetana (T 88). Paratypes: 3, 4: ibidem, 22.V.1991, idem (T 90); 1, 9: ibidem, 2130m, 27.IV.1992, idem (T 101); 6, 7: Peitawushan above Kuai-Ku hut, 2750m, 22.V.1991 (T 89).- HT and PTT in coll. Smetana (Ottawa), PTT also in cP. Description: Apterous, black with brownish hue, elytra brownish, punctation about as in S. perpastus nov.sp.. Maxillary palpi yellowish. Antennae and legs as in S. perpastus. Length: 2.8-3.3mm (forebody: 1.5-1.6mm). PM of the HT: HW: 29.5; DE; 15; PW: 22; PL: 22; EW: 26.3; EL: 23; SL: 17. Male: Metasternum flat, moderately coarsely, very densely punctate. Sternites 3-5 finer and denser punctate medially than laterally. Sternite 6 with a shallow triangular impression medially, which is very finely and very densely punctate and pubescent, sternite 7 with a broad, slightly divergent median impression, punctation and pubescence as previous, posterior margin broadly and shallowly emarginate. Sternite 8 about as in S. perpastus. Sternite 9 with long apicolateral teeth. Aedeagus (fig. 29), apical portion of median lobe triangularly narrowed, expulsion hooks separated; parameres with about 12 setae in apical third. Female: Sternite 8 at posterior margin triangularly projection, apex rounded (about as in fig. 10). Valvifer with a long apicolateral tooth. Spermatheca (fig. 57), infundibulum short and broad. Comparative notes: In most respects very similar to S. perpastus but the median portion of frons extending beyond the level of medial eye margins and the lateral margination of the abdominal segments even narrower, sometimes on segment 5 only traces of a thread-like line visible.- This species belongs also to the S. cephalotes- group. A reliable identification is only possible by examining the genitalia. Etymology: Since the impressions on pronotum and elytra are very distinct, I name this new species " persculpturatus " (Lat. =very distinctly sculptured).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".