MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912735167 · doi:10.5284/1111149

Archaeological Investigations at Wolverhampton City Learning Quarter, Bilston Street, Wolverhampton

2023· article· en· W6912735167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavationRedevelopmentDemolitionRidgeQuarter (Canadian coin)Pottery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An archaeological excavation was undertaken by Worcestershire Archaeology from September 2020 to November 2021 at two sites within the City Learning Quarter off Bilston Road (NGR SO 9168 9840) following on from evaluation trenching. The project was commissioned by Turner and Townsend on behalf of their client, City of Wolverhampton Council, in advance of a proposed redevelopment of the site, comprising the demolition and refurbishment of various buildings on the site, plus the construction of new buildings, for a public education quarter. The site was formerly the location of the Great Hall, a moated manor house known to be in existence by the 16th century and that became one of the major enamelling factories in Wolverhampton in the late-18th to 19th centuries. It had been the focus of previous archaeological work from 2000 to 2007, which revealed parts of the manor house and moat, along with medieval ridge and furrow beneath the clay platform, which had been created with material from the excavation of the moat circuit. Two areas were excavated, that is in the north-east and south-west corners of the site. Two areas were excavated, that is in the north-east and south-west corners of the site. The northern Area 1 revealed a previously unknown redesign of the moat circuit, suggesting that the eastern side of the moat had been backfilled and then extended around the turn of the 18th century. The dating of the original stretch of moat hinted at a possible medieval origin, though this was far from conclusive, and a 16th century date contemporary with the construction of the Tudor Hall remains its most likely date of origin. The excavation also showed how the extended moat section was not excavated as deep as the original, being less than 1m deep compared with the 2m, or more, of the earlier moat. Also revealed was the graduated backfilling of the moat in its final years. When only its north-east corner was extant, a retaining wall was inserted on the west side of the moat channel by way of a revetment. In the southern Area 2, the footprint of part of the 19th century expansion of the enamelling works was evident. This included the remains of the furnace, showing at least three phases of flue construction, along with other adaptations to the design. The buildings identified here aligned well with those recorded on the 1840 Health of Towns map, which also described the function of the different buildings. Here, two earlier ditches were also identified, one of which was likely a land boundary between orchards as shown on Taylor's Map of 1750. The other was probably the outer edge of the south-western corner of the moat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207