MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912735624 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8407571

Chlorocanta Cole & Chatfield-Taylor & Smeds & Cooley & Gonzalez & Wong 2023, gen. nov.

2023· article· en· W6912735624 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeAllotypeRange (aeronautics)DorsumMeaning (existential)Deciduous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chlorocanta Chatfield-Taylor, 2023 gen. nov. Fig. 8 (A. dorsal habitus, B. male genitalia, right lateral view, C. male genitalia, dorsal view, D. female genitalia, ventral view, E. timbal) Type species: Okanagana viridis Davis, 1918, here designated Included species: Chlorocanta viridis (Davis, 1918) comb. n. Type Locality: Holotype male is from O’Reilly, Bolivar County, MS, 10-VII-1917. The holotype is in the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) and the allotype is located at the Mississippi Entomological Museum, Mississippi State University (Sanborn & Heath 2017). Etymology: From the Greek khlōrós, meaning “pale green”, in reference to the uniform green coloration of this genus, and Latin cantus, meaning “song” or “singing”. Feminine. Distribution: Chlorocanta viridis is found in the southeast United States. It is confined to deciduous forests and may be associated with elm (Ulmus; Hill & Marshall 2013). It is also known to come to lights unlike related New World Tibicininae. Its range extends east to near the Mississippi / Alabama border, west to Houston, Texas, north into the southwest corner of Tennessee, and there are several records from southeast Oklahoma. Description: A medium-sized cicada that is most notable for the bright green coloration on the entire body of both sexes. The type species C. viridis was recently treated in detail (under Okanagana viridis) by Hill and Marshall (2013) and this description of Chlorocanta was aided in part by their paper. Head: The width of the head across the eyes extends distinctly past apical pronotal margin. The clypeus is weakly produced and rounded, lacking a strong clypeal suture. The vertex has a depression along the midline but lacks a strong epicranial suture. Thorax: The lateral pronotal margins are subquadrate with the anterior margin convexly curved and the posterior margin sinuate. The apical angles of the pronotum are pointed and the humeral angles are rounded and not strongly pronounced. The center of the pronotum is broad, without a clear longitudinal sulcus. There are two bilateral fissures on each side of the pronotum that run inwards towards the center of the pronotum at an anterior-posterior angle. The cruciform elevation is located directly anterior to the hind margin of the mesonotum. The mesonotum is unmarked. The posterior edge of the metanotum is visible. Wings: Both fore and hind wings are hyaline with green venation. The fore wing length is 2.86–2.99 times the width, with 8 apical cells. The trapezoidal-shaped radial cell reaches the costal node halfway along length of costa, and the ratio of apical cell to ulnar cell length is approximately 1:1. The hind wing has 6 apical cells with a typical branched CuA vein (Fig. 8A). Legs: Metacoxa with a meracanthus with a distinct triangular shape, equal in length to the coxa. Metatibiae with spines, all other tibiae without spines. Abdomen: In males the timbals are completely exposed with the timbal membrane having two long and two short ribs (Fig. 8C; Hill & Marshall 2013) The tergites are a uniform green and the sternites are a paler yellowish-green compared to the rest of the body. Male Genitalia: Sternite VII is twice the length of epipleurite VII and flattened at the tip. Sternite VII covers the base of sternite VIII. Sternite VIII is short, triangular, and tapering towards the tip with little curvature. The uncus is not hooked at the tip. The dorsal margin of the uncus is longer than the ventral margin, which curves up to form a distinct point as in many Okanagana. Female Genitalia: Sternite VII has broad, almost triangular primary notch with slight bulging to the lateral margins and, contrary to Davis (1918), has a distinct secondary notch. The sides of sternite VII form rounded apical prongs. Diagnosis: Chlorocanta is a North American cicada with the hind margin of the metanotum not hidden by the mesonotum, combined with a trapezoidal-shaped radial cell that reaches the costal node situated halfway along length of costa, characters that Chlorocanta shares with Okanagana, Tibicinoides, and Hewlettia gen. nov. If collection data is available, Chlorocanta is the only cicada with the above combination of characters within its range. If sufficiently preserved, the bright green coloration is enough to differentiate this genus from both Okanagana and Tibicinoides, however specimens of Chlorocanta often fade to a paler yellow which may confuse this single diagnostic feature (Hill & Marshall 2013). Male Chlorocanta possess two long timbal ribs (Fig. 8E) as in Tibicinoides but have an uncus without a hook (Fig. 8B), the combination of which separates male Chlorocanta from other related genera. The uncus of Okanagana is not hooked (Fig. 2B) and all species have more than two long timbal ribs (Fig. 2C) including O. aurantiaca, the only other green Okanagana in North America. Tibicinoides have two long timbal ribs (Fig. 3C) but the uncus is always hooked (Fig. 3B). Hewlettia gen. nov. are green but have 5 apical cells in the hind wing (Fig. 9A) as opposed to 6 apical cells in Chlorocanta (Fig. 8A), features unique in both sexes of the genus Hewlettia gen. nov. While the large size (up to 25 mm; Davis 1918; Hill & Marshall 2013), and green (or faded yellowish color) is enough to diagnose females with reliability, the shape of sternite VII (Fig. 8D) can ensure a diagnosis. The almost triangular primary notch with slight bulging to the lateral margins and distinct secondary notch lacks the consistent rounding of the notch seen in Tibicinoides (Fig. 3D) and there are no purely green (or yellowish) Okanagana of that size except for O. aurantiaca, which may be immediately diagnosed by the presence of a long, black longitudinal stripe on the abdomen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicDiatoms and Algae Research→French-language works237,207→