MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912736376 · doi:10.5683/sp3/a7fm1w

Aperçu de l'Enquête canadienne sur les mesures de la santé

2015· dataset· fr· W6912736376 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2015
Typedataset
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsStatistics Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationContext (archaeology)Presentation (obstetrics)Derogation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une presentation visait à discuter exploration les enjeux émergents en matière de santé publique et les nouvelles technologies de mesure, établir des données de reference nationales sur les problèmes de santé majeurs, établir des données de reference nationales sur les problèmes de santé majeurs, determiner les relations entre les facteurs de risqué, les methods de protection et l'état de santé, évaluer la validité des renseignements declares par les répondants ou par personne interpose, et assembler un échantillon representative de la population nationale à des fins de stockage dans une biobanque.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0130.020
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→