Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stigmatomyces purpureus Thaxt. MB#191132 Fig. 61A–B Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 36: 404 (Thaxter 1901a). – Type: [Not designated] [Ind. loc.] “On all parts of Scatella stagnalis Fallen. Kittery Point, Maine, and vicinity of Cambridge, Mass., September”; FH. [USA] Stigmatomyces scatellae S.W.T.Batra. (Batra 1963: 986) [MB#339711] Diagnostic features Thallus hyaline. Basal cell of appendage supporting a series of three cells, each bearing solitary antheridia on the inner side, except for the uppermost cell which gives rise two antheridia, where the distal one bears a dorsal spinous process. Perithecium with an oval venter, and a well-distinguished, short neck, which tapers distally into an asymmetrical tip, showing two distinct projections (Fig. 61A, arrows). Perithecial outer wall cells arranged spirally and forming conspicuous ridges and corrugations.[Detailed descriptions: Thaxter 1908; Majewski 1994b; Weir & Rossi 1995, 1997] Distribution and hosts Found on five continents: Europe (Spain, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Poland and Finland), America (USA), Asia (India), Africa (Algeria) and Oceania (New Zealand) (Majewski 2008). Recently reported also from Canada, Portugal (Rossi et al. 2013) and Turkey (Rossi 2016). It is common on flies of the genus Scatella (Diptera Ephydridae). Collections examined from Denmark On Scatella stagnalis (Fallen, 1813) (Diptera; Ephydridae) DENMARK – Østjylland (EJ) • Gjerlev; 56°35.242′ N, 10°7.898′ E; NH67; Jul. 1882; H.J. Hansen Dry0012; V. Michelsen det.; ZMUC C-F-124025, C-F-124026. Remarks First record from Denmark. Although the Danish material is in rather poor condition, it is perfectly identifiable by the two projections from the perithecial apex and the spiral ridges on the venter of the perithecium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".