Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eothalassius sp. (Figs 8, 11, 34–38) Material Examined. NEW CALEDONIA: Plage de Poé [ca 21°36ʹ48ʺS 165°24ʹ02ʺE], 15.5 km W Bourail, 15.vii.1995, beach/shrubs, B.J. Sinclair (1♀, CNC). Diagnosis. Body length: 1.51 mm. This New Caledonian species of Eothalassius, known only from a single female specimen, has wing cell dm and crossvein dm-m present (Fig. 36), unlike E. platypalpus and E. merzi, but not E. borkenti and E. gracilis, and lacks spiny setae on the basal portion of the costa (Fig. 36) that are present in E. borkenti. The New Caledonian female is very similar to the relatively widespread E. gracilis, which is known from Thailand, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea, but has a dark brown postpedicel (yellow in E. gracilis) and dark brown palpus (brownish-yellow in E. gracilis) (Fig. 35). Distribution. This potentially undescribed species is currently known only from the coast of the Bourail Commune in the South Province of New Caledonia (Figs 8, 11). Remarks. The unique female specimen of this apparently undescribed species represents the first record of the genus in New Caledonia. It was collected from a sandy coastal beach (Fig. 11), similar to the habitat of other Eothalassius species, except E. borkenti, which inhabits rocky seashores. Shamshev & Grootaert (2003) noted some colour variation among the type series of E. gracilis (with some paler specimens), so the discovery of a male of the New Caledonian Eothalassius is required to confirm its status as a separate species and not a darker form of E. gracilis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".