MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912753314 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6250493

Botula

2007· article· en· W6912753314 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxonomy (biology)ZooidLife history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Botula references in Adula Adula californiensis (Philippi, 1847) Modiola californiensis ‘Eschscholtz’ - Philippi, 1847: 113; Clapp & Kenk 1963: (784), = Adula californiensis Botula californiensis (Philippi) - Dall 1916a: 18 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 282, = Adula californiensis); Clemens 1933: 31 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 242, = Adula californiensis); Keep 1935: (331, 333); Haas 1942: (110); Haas 1943: (8); Hirase 1936: (11), pl. 18, fig. 11 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 464); Keen 1940: 480 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 529, = Adula californiensis); La Roque 1953: 37 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 590, = Adula californiensis); Light et al. 1954: (238), fig. 102d (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 605, = Adula californiensis); Nomura & Hatai 1935: 8, (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 741); Oldroyd 1924b: 24 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 748, = Adula californiensis); Haderlie et al. 1974: (200) Botula (Adula) californiensis Philippi - Keep 1935: (64); Oldroyd 1924a: 71 –72, pl. 27, fig. 5; Clapp & Kenk 1963: (748, = Adula californiensis) Botula californica (in error for californiensis), - Morris 1952: (60), pl. 7, fig. 10. Geographic distribution: East Pacific, British Columbia, Vancouver Island to San Diego, California, also North Japan Adula diegensis (Dall, 1911) Geographic distribution: East Pacific, North America Adula falcata (Gould, 1851) Lithodomus falcatus Gould, 1851: 92, about 70-12- 12 mm; Gould 1853: 403–404, pl. 16, fig. 9 Adula falcata Gould - Carpenter 1864: (425), 644 Botula falcata Gould - Dall 1916b: 18 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 282); Keep 1935: (333); Morris 1952: 23, (60, 212), pl. 7 (2 views); Fitch 1953: 51, fig. 17 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 366); Light et al. 1954: 235, fig. 102e (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 605); Yonge 1955: (384–389), text-figs. 1B, 2–5, 6A; Yonge 1963: (16, 19), text-fig. 8A–C; Haderlie et al. 1974: (200, 202); Nielsen 1976b: (146); Pojeta & Palmer 1976: (167); Kleemann 1983: (10); Morton 1983: (174) Botula (Adula) falcata (Gould) - Oldroyd 1924a: 71, pl. 21, figs. 8, 9; Johnson & Snook 1927: 431 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 516); Keep 1935: (64); Hertlein & Strong 1946: 74 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 454); Smith & Mackenzie 1948: 171 (fide Clapp & Kenk 1963: 899); Abbott 1954: 356, pl. 29; Franc 1960: (2080), fig. 1744A; Clapp & Kenk 1963: (748, = Adula falcata) Adula (Botula) falcata Gould - Fankboner 1971: 28–49, 10 figs Geographic distribution: Monterey, Coos Bay, Oregon to San Diego, California, Mexico

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4920.374

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine and coastal plant biology→French-language works237,207→