MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912765066 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6167583

Lathys subalberta Zhang, Hu & Zhang, 2012, sp. nov.

2012· article· en· W6912765066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeTaxonomy (biology)ParatypeLarge whiteSpire (mollusc)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lathys subalberta sp. nov. Figs 6A–F, 7A –I, 8A–G, 14 Type material. Holotype: Male, China, Shaanxi Province: Zhouzhi County, Houzhenzi Town, 33°50'50ʺ N, 107°50'0ʺ E, 23 May 2009, Z.S. Zhang, R.Y. Zhuo, Y.F. Zhang & G. Wei leg. (SWUC); Paratypes: 1 female, same data as holotype (SWUC); 1 female, Houzhenzi, 3 July 1997, J. Martens & P. Jäger leg. (SMF). Etymology. The specific name refers to its similarity to L. alberta (Gerstch, 1946); adjective. Diagnosis. The new species is quite similar to L. stigmatisata -group species, such as L. stigmatisata from Europe (Marusik et al. 2009b: 22, figs 4, 29–32, 44, 51–53), L. alberta from North America (Figs 12A–G, 13A–G; 1 male and 4 females from Colorado, loaned from AMNH, examined) and L. maculosa (Karsch, 1879) from Japan (Ono & Ogata 2009: 134, figs 1–7). Epigynes of these species can not be easily distinguished from one another. But male palp of the new species can be distinguished by a relatively low cymbium and the different origin of embolus (Figs 6B–C, 7G–H). Additionally, bodies of the new species are relatively larger than the others, opisthosomas have white scale-like markings dorsally (absent in the others)(Figs 7A, 8A). Discription. Male Holotype (Figs 7A–E) total length 2.80. Prosoma 1.29 long, 1.08 wide; opisthosoma 1.63 long, 1.21 wide. AME smallest and ALE largest. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.11, PME 0.09, PLE 0.11; AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE 0.04, PME–PME 0.09, PME–PLE 0.09, ALE–PLE 0.02. MOA 0.26 long, front width 0.18, back width 0.26. Clypeus height (0.08) wider than the diameter of AME. Chelicerae with 4 promarginal and 4 or 5 retromarginal teeth. Leg measurements: I 4.85 (1.39, 1.82, 1.10, 0.54); II 3.84 (1.17, 1.33, 0.87, 0.47); III 3.19 (0.98, 1.01, 0.76, 0.44); IV 3.87 (1.17, 1.35, 0.93, 0.42). Leg formula: 1423. Opisthosoma with four indistinct black chevron-like markings, some white spots dorsally and a narrow cribellum ventrally. Male palp (Figs 6A–D, 7F –I) without patellar apophysis. Tibia with three apophyses, surrounding the terminal part of conductor. Embolus originating retrolatero-distally and coiled along the margin of tegulum, mostly holded by the reversed coiled distal arm of conductor. Conductor with a greatly long distal arm and a screw-like terminal part extending to the dorsal tibia. One of the female paratypes (Figs 8A–E) total length 2.26. Prosoma 0.86 long, 0.69 wide; opisthosoma 1.49 long, 1.19 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.05, ALE 0.08, PME 0.05, PLE 0.07; AME–AME 0.03, AME–ALE 0.02, PME–PME 0.06, PME–PLE 0.06, ALE–PLE 0.02. MOA 0.17 long, front width 0.12, back width 0.18. Clypeus height 0.04. Calamistrum distinct. Leg measurements: I 2.31 (0.67, 0.84, 0.49, 0.31); II 1.98 (0.60, 0.69, 0.41, 0.28); III 1.76 (0.56, 0.57, 0.38, 0.25); IV 2.21 (0.67, 0.77, 0.51, 0.26). Leg formula: 1423. Chelicerae relatively short. Cribellum distinct, uniform. The other characters similar to these of male. Epigyne (Figs 6E–F, 8F–G) with a couple of rounded copulatory openings. Copulatory ducts long and looped. Spermathecae spherical, with wide interdistance and located laterally of copulatory openings. Fertilization ducts posteriorly originating from the inner side of spermathecae. Distribution. China (Shaanxi)(Fig. 14).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207