MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912773897 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6726940

Phylloderma stenops Peters 1865

2019· article· en· W6912773897 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesDorsumChinWhite (mutation)Taxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

38. Pale-faced Bat Phylloderma stenops French: Phylloderme de Peters / German: Peters-Lanzennase / Spanish: Filoderma pélido Taxonomy. Phyllostoma (Phylloderma) stenops Peters, 1865, “Cayenne,” French Guiana. Widely used subspecific names boliviensis and septentrionalis have been changed for gender agreement. R. J. Baker and collaborators in 1988 included stenops under Phyllostomus, but reanalysis placed it back as the sole species in Phylloderma. Three subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. P.s.stenopsPeters,1865—EColombia,Venezuela,theGuianas,EEcuador,EPeru,N&EBrazil,andNBolivia;alsoonTrinidadI. P.s.bolivienseBarquez&Ojeda,1979—EBolivia. P. s. septentrionale G. G. Goodwin, 1940 — from S Mexico (Veracruz and Oaxaca) through Central America to NW South America in W Colombia, W Ecuador, and NW Peru. Descriptive notes. Head-body 83-109 mm, tail 14-21 mm, ear 24-29 mm, hindfoot 18— 25 mm, forearm 66-81 mm; weight 25-39 g. The Pale-faced Bat is large and robust and externally can be confused with species of Phyllostomus. It has prominent chin and lip excrescences (but not like those found in Trachops), and ears are triangular, with pointed tips; these and anterior part of face are almost naked. Noseleaf is wide at base, with pointed tip and horseshoe fused to upperlip below nostrils. Dorsal fur has short brown to reddish brown hairs, often marked with white flecks; ventral fur is usually paler, with grayish hairs, well frosted with pale tips. Wing membranes are blackish, with conspicuous white wingtips. One-half of forearm is hairy. Calcars are shorter or nearly equal to feet, and short tail reaches only one-half of uropatagium. Pale-faced Bats can be distinguished from species of Phyllostomus by conspicuously expanded braincase, bifid I, three lower premolars (P, small), and narrow-crowned molars. Dental formulais12/2,C1/1,P2/3,M 3/3 (x2) = 34. Habitat. Variety of habitats, mostly lowland and humid formations, most commonly ever green or riparian forests, but also drier regions, such as dry and xeric shrublands, from sea level up to ¢. 1750 m. Pale-faced Bats are strongly associated with multistrata tropical evergreen forests but are broadly tolerant of man-made clearings in Venezuela. A few records come from highly transformed areas such as forest patches or agricultural clearings. Food and Feeding. Diet includes insects, with mainly beetles dominating diets in wet seasons; some fruits are also eaten. One individual caught in Costa Rica had eaten fruit, especially those of cucurbit vines, and also Annonaceae. In Brazil, another individual chewed its way into the nest of a social wasp, where it ate larvae and pupae. A Pale-faced Bat was collected while it was attacking a large rat, apparently a spiny-rat (Proechimys, Echimyidae). Breeding. No information. Activity patterns. The Palefaced Bat is nocturnal; some studies suggest it leaves the roost shortly after sunset and often flies in groups. It appears to roost in hollow trees. Movements, Home range and Social organization. No information. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The [UCNRed List, as it 1s considered locally rare, with few records from specific localities but with a broad distribution. Bibliography. Baker, Dunn & Nelson (1988), Barquez & Ojeda (1979), Brito & Arguero (2012), Clarke & Downie (2001), Goodwin (1940), LaVal (1977), Reid (2009), Salas et al. (2014), Simmons (2005), Van Den Bussche & Baker (1993), Williams & Genoways (2008).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicBat Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→