MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912775799 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7525412

3D-Aware Semantic-Guided Generative Model for Human Synthesis

2022· article· en· W6912775799 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Parks and Wilderness Society
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsGenerative grammarSet (abstract data type)Field (mathematics)Texture synthesisGenerative modelCode (set theory)Computer graphicsImage synthesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generative Neural Radiance Field (GNeRF) models, which extract<br> implicit 3D representations from 2D images, have recently been shown to produce<br> realistic images representing rigid/semi-rigid objects, such as human faces<br> or cars. However, they usually struggle to generate high-quality images representing<br> non-rigid objects, such as the human body, which is of a great interest for<br> many computer graphics applications. This paper proposes a 3D-aware Semantic-<br> Guided Generative Model (3D-SGAN) for human image synthesis, which combines<br> a GNeRF with a texture generator. The former learns an implicit 3D representation<br> of the human body and outputs a set of 2D semantic segmentation<br> masks. The latter transforms these semantic masks into a real image, adding a<br> realistic texture to the human appearance. Without requiring additional 3D information,<br> our model can learn 3D human representations with a photo-realistic,<br> controllable generation. Our experiments on the DeepFashion dataset show that<br> 3D-SGAN significantly outperforms the most recent baselines. The code is available<br> at https://github.com/zhangqianhui/3DSGAN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207