Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Corythucha Stål 1873 Corythucha Stål, 122. Type species: Tingis fuscigera Stål, 1862a. Designated by Van Duzee, 1916a. Corythucha acculta Drake and Poor 1942 Corythucha acculta Drake and Poor, 302 [new species: Argentina: Tucumán]— Drake and Ruhoff 1965, 141 [Argentina]— Bachmann 1999, 220 [Argentina: Tucumán]— Di Iorio 2004, 280 [Argentina: Salta: El Tabacal, Orán; Tucumán: El Cadillal, Ticucho]— Montemayor and Coscarón 2005, 36 [Argentina: Córdoba: Los Cocos; Misiones; Salta: El Tabacal, San Ramón de la Nueva Orán; Tucumán: El Cadillal, San Miguel de Tucumán, Ticucho]—Montemayor 2009, 61 [Argentina]. Corythucha argentinensis Monte 1940a Corythucha argentinensis Monte, 297 [new species: Argentina: Chaco: Resistencia]— Drake and Ruhoff 1965, 142 [Argentina]— Ajmat 1991, 143 [Argentina: Chaco]— Di Iorio 2004, 280 [Argentina: Tucumán]— Montemayor and Coscarón 2005, 36 [Argentina: Chaco: Resistencia; Tucumán: San Miguel de Tucumán]—Montemayor 2009, 61 [Argentina]. Corythucha bonaerensis Montemayor 2009 Corythucha bonaerensis Montemayor, 62 [new species: Argentina: Buenos Aires: La Plata] — Montemayor and Dellapé 2013, 347 [Argentina: Buenos Aires: La Plata]. Corythucha fuscomaculata (Stål) 1860a Tingis fusco - maculata Stål, 63 [new species: Brazil]. 1941a Corythucha fuscomaculata: Monte, 88 [Argentina]— Kormilev 1955e, 67 [Argentina: Jujuy: City]— Drake and Ruhoff 1965, 149 [Argentina]— Ajmat 1991, 140 [Argentina: Corrientes: Apóstol, Manantiales, Parada La Patria; Jujuy; Tucumán: Caspechango, La Sala, San Miguel del Tucumán]— Di Iorio 2004, 280 [Argentina: Tucumán]—Montemayor and Coscarón, 36 [Argentina: Corrientes: Los Manantiales, Paso de La Patria; Jujuy: City; Misiones: San Ignacio; Tucumán: Caspinchango, La Sala, San Miguel de Tucumán]—Montemayor 2009, 61 [Argentina]. Corythucha rolstoni Ajmat 1991 Corythucha rolstoni Ajmat, 141 [new species: Argentina: Misiones: Acaraguá]— Montemayor and Coscarón 2005, 36 [Argentina: Misiones: Acaraguá]—Montemayor 2009, 61 [Argentina]. Corythucha tapiensis Ajmat 1991 Corythucha tapiensis Ajmat, 143 [Argentina: Tucumán: Tapia]— Di Iorio 2004, 280 [Argentina: Tucumán] — Montemayor and Coscarón 2005, 36 [Argentina: Tucumán: Tapia]—Montemayor 2009, 61 [Argentina] — Guilbert and Montemayor 2010, 553 [Argentina: Jujuy: Calilegua; Salta: Orán, Urundel; Tucumán: Tapia].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".