MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912783370 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6265524

Smidtia fumiferanae Tothill 1912

2005· article· en· W6912783370 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChoristoneura fumiferanaSpruce budwormTortricidaeHost (biology)Diterpene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smidtia fumiferanae (Tothill, 1912), Fig. 50 Host records ex. Choristoneura conflictana: Prentice 1955, as Omotoma fumiferanae (SK, MB); † Arnaud 1978, as Omotoma fumiferanae (SK, MB); † Huber et al. 1996, as Winthemia fumiferanae (America north of Mexico). Host records ex. Choristoneura fumiferana: Wilkes & Anderson 1947, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. Archips fumiferana (ON, QC); Dowden et al. 1951, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. Archips fumiferana (NY); Raizenne 1952, as Omotoma fumiferanae (ON); Miller 1955, as Omotoma fumiferanae (NB); McGugan & Blais 1959, as Omotoma fumiferanae (ON); Blais 1960, as Omotoma fumiferanae (QC); MacDonald & Webb 1963, as Omotoma fumiferanae (NB); † Miller 1963, as Winthemia amoena (NB); Blais 1965, as Winthemia amoena (QC); † Tilles & Woodley 1984, as Omotoma fumiferanae (ME); Hébert et al. 1989, as Winthemia fumiferanae (QC); Hébert & Cloutier 1990a, as Winthemia fumiferanae (QC); Hébert & Cloutier 1990b, as Winthemia fumiferanae (QC); Hébert et al. 1990, as Winthemia fumiferanae (QC); Huber et al. 1996, as Winthemia fumiferanae (NB); Bourchier & Smith 1998, as Winthemia fumiferanae (ON); † Smith et al. 2002, as Winthemia fumiferanae (eastern Canada). Host records ex. Choristoneura fumiferana and/or Choristoneura occidentalis: Tothill 1912, as Winthemia fumiferanae ex. Tortrix fumiferana (BC, QC); Hewitt 1913, as Winthemia fumiferanae ex. Tortrix fumiferana (BC, QC); Tothill 1913, as Winthemia fumiferanae ex. Tortrix fumiferana (BC, QC); † Johannsen 1913, as Winthemia fumiferanae ex. Tortrix fumiferana (Canada); Tothill 1923, as Winthemia ex. spruce budworm (BC, NB); Brown 1941, as Winthemia fumiferanae ex. Cacoecia fumiferana (Canada); Dowden et al. 1948, as Omotoma (Winthemia) fumiferanae ex. Archips fumiferana (North America); † Zwolfer 1961, as Winthemia amoena ex. C. fumiferana (North America); † Arnaud 1978, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. C. fumiferana (BC, OR, ON, QC, NB, NH, NY). Host records ex. Choristoneura fumiferana, Choristoneura occidentalis and/or Choristoneura pinus: † Ross 1952, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. spruce and/or jack pine budworm (Canada). Host records ex. Choristoneura occidentalis: McKnight 1974, as Omotoma fumiferanae (CO); Doganlar & Beirne 1978, as Winthemia fumiferanae (BC); Harris & Dawson 1979, as Winthemia fumiferanae (BC); Schmid 1981, as Timnavia [= Timavia] fumiferanae (NM); Torgersen et al. 1984, as Timavia fumiferanae (WA, OR, ID, MT); † Harris & Dawson 1985, as Winthemia fumiferanae (BC); † Torgersen 1985, as Timavia fumiferanae (WA, OR, ID, MT). Host records probably ex. Choristoneura occidentalis: Coppel 1947, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. Archips fumiferana (BC); Wilkes et al. 1949, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. C. fumiferana (BC); Coppel 1953, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. C. fumiferana (BC); Carolin & Coulter 1959, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. C. fumiferana (OR); † Coppel 1960, as Omotoma fumiferanae ex. C. fumiferana (BC). Host records ex. Choristoneura pinus: Nealis 1991 (ON). This distinctive and common species is found throughout most of America north of Mexico (O’Hara & Wood 2004). For many years it was variously assigned to Omotoma Lioy, Winthemia Robineau­Desvoidy, or Timavia Robineau­Desvoidy, but was recently moved to Smidtia Robineau­Desvoidy by Shima (1996), who also placed Omotoma and Timavia as generic synonyms of Smidtia. Smidtia fumiferanae can be distinguished from the other tachinids treated here by the presence of hairs on the mid portion of the parafacial (Fig.3); it differs from Winthemia species in having the hairs on the dorsum of the abdomen mostly erect (hairs recumbent in Winthemia). Adults are mostly 5–9mm long. The egg, larval instars, and puparium were described by Coppel and Smith (1957). Smidtia fumiferanae (as Omotoma fumiferanae) was included in a key to the puparia of dipterous parasitoids of Choristoneura species by Ross (1952) and in a key to the adults of dipterous parasitoids of C. occidentalis (as C. fumiferana) in British Columbia by Coppel (1960). Females of S. fumiferanae lay unincubated eggs directly on their hosts, as is typical of members of the Winthemiini. Eggs are laid primarily on sixth instar budworms and the first instar maggot is capable of parasitizing its host after about three days of development (Coppel & Smith 1957; Hébert & Cloutier 1990a). However, the first instar maggot generally waits in the egg for the host to begin pupation before entering it (Coppel & Smith 1957; Hébert & Cloutier 1990a). Hence, parasitoid development usually takes place entirely within the host pupa. Less frequently, fourth or fifth instar hosts are attacked (Doganlar & Beirne 1978), and emergence from sixth instar hosts has been reported (Harris & Dawson 1979). Once the maggot has completed development, it leaves the host pupa and pupariates in the soil (Coppel & Smith 1957; Hébert et al. 1989). The parasitoid overwinters in the puparium and there is typically one generation per year (Schaffner & Griswold 1934; Coppel & Smith 1957; Hébert et al. 1989). Smidtia fumiferanae is arguably the most important tachinid parasitoid of Choristoneura species in Canada. It was ranked by Wilkes et al. (1949, as Omotoma fumiferanae) as the third most important parasitoid, and single most important dipterous parasitoid, of C. occidentalis (as C. fumiferana) in British Columbia. Harris and Dawson (1979) reported parasitism of late instar C. occidentalis larvae by S. fumiferanae (as Winthemia fumiferanae) as high as 18% in British Columbia. Smidtia fumiferanae (as Omotoma fumiferanae) was considered a major parasitoid of budworms in Colorado by Dowden et al. (1948) and in Oregon by Carolin and Coulter (1959). In the East, budworm parasitism by S. fumiferanae has not matched the levels reported in the West, but the species is common and parasitism can be locally significant (Coppel and Smith 1957, Blais 1960; Hébert et al. 1989). The species was included among the five tachinids treated by Tilles and Woodley (1984) in their manual of spruce budworm parasitoids in Maine. The hosts of S. fumiferanae include two species of Geometridae and a few species of Noctuidae (Arnaud 1978, as Omotoma fumiferanae), in addition to the Choristoneura species indicated in Table 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlFrench-language works237,207