MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912792636 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6711634

Microtus pennsylvanicus

2017· article· en· W6912792636 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoleSubspeciesMicrotusDorsumBank vole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

149. Meadow Vole Microtus pennsylvanicus French: Campagnol des prés / German: Wiesenwhimaus / Spanish: Topillo de campina Other common names: Admiralty Island Meadow Vole (admiraltiae), Block Island Meadow Vole (provectus), Chihuahua Vole (chihuahuensis), Penobscot Meadow Vole (shattucki), Potholes Meadow Vole (kincaid) Taxonomy. Mus pennsylvanica [sic] Ord, 1815, “meadows below Philadelphia,” Pennsylvania, USA. Twenty-seven subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. M.p.pennsylvanicusOrd,1815—extremeSEQuebecandNewBrunswick,Canada,andfromSouthDakota,N&ENebraska,andextremeNEKansasEtotheAtlanticcoastfromMaineStoSouthCarolina,USA. M.p.acadicusBangs,1897—PrinceEdwardIandNovaScotia,Canada. M.p.admiraltiaeHeller,1909—AdmiraltyI,Alaska,USA. M.p.alcorniBaker,1951—fromSWAlaska,USA,EtoSYukon,Canada. M.p.aphorodemusPreble,1902—SENunavutandNEManitoba,Canada. M.p.axtecusJ.A.Allen,1893—restrictedrangeinNWNewMexico,USA. M.p.chihuahuensisBradley&Cockrum,1968—knownonlyfromthevicinityofGaleana,NWChihuahua,Mexico. M.p.copelandiYoungman,1967—extremeSNewBrunswick,Canada. M.p.drummondiiAudubon&Bachman,1854—fromNAlaskaandNWYukonSEtoWOntario,Canada,andextremeWWashington,NIdaho,extremeNWMontana,NorthDakota,andextremeNSouthDakota,USA. M.p.enixusBangs,1896—C&NEQuebecandLabrador,Canada. M.p.finitusS.Anderson,1956—SWNebraska,extremeNEColorado,andextremeNWKansas,USA. M.p.fontigenusBangs,1896—WOntarioandSQuebec,Canada. M.p.funebrisDale,1940—SWBritishColumbia,Canada,andNEWashington,USA. M.p.insperatusJ.A.Allen,1894—SEAlbertaandSWSaskatchewan,Canada,N&EMontana,WNorthDakota,NEWyoming,andWSouthDakota,USA. M.p.kincaidiDalquest,1941—knownonlyfromMosesLake,CWashington,USA. M.p.labradoriusBailey,1898—NWQuebec,Canada. M.p.magdalenensisYoungman,1967—MagdalenIs,Quebec,Canada. M.p.microcephalusRhoads,1894—SEBritishColumbiatoSAlberta,Canada. M.p.modestusBaird,1858—fromCColoradoStoCNewMexico,USA. M.p.nigransRhoads,1897—EVirginiaandNENorthCarolina,USA. M.p.provectusBangs,1908—BlockI,RhodeIsland,USA. M.p.pullatusS.Anderson,1956—C&EIdaho,WMontana,WWyoming,andNCUtah,USA. M.p.rubidusDale,1940—SEAlaska,USA,andWBritishColumbia,Canada. M.p.shattuckiHowe,1901—IsleboroandNorthHavenIs,Maine,USA. M.p.tananaensisBaker,1951—CAlaska,USA. M.p.terraenovaeBangs,1894—Newfoundland,Canada. M. p. uligocola S. Anderson, 1956 — extreme SE Wyoming and NE Colorado, USA. Descriptive notes. Head—body 107-131 mm, tail 33-64 mm, ear 12-16 mm, hindfoot 18-24 mm; weight c.44 g (both sexes). Morphology of Meadow Voles varies substantially across its large North American distribution. Pelage color varies with age and among subspecies. Dorsal fur ranges from bright yellowish chestnut to dull bister (brownish yellow), with interspersed black-tipped hairs. Northern subspecies are redder, and southern subspecies tend to be black to gray. Venter is generally gray but can tend toward white or buffy. Tail is bicolored. M, has five closed loops, M, has three transverse loops and no triangles, M* has four closed triangles and a posterior loop, and M? has three closed triangles. Chromosomal complement is 2n = 46, FN = 50. Habitat. Mesic habitats, especially those with high grass undercover but also woodlands. Food and Feeding. The Meadow Vole eats many species of grasses (e.g. Poa, Panicum, and Muhlenbergia, all Poaceae), sedges, mosses, other vegetation, and fungi. It occasionally eats insects and even carrion. When their numbers are high, they can affect old-field succession and damage commercial fruit trees by eating seedlings, bark, and roots. Preferred foods have low alkaloid and fiber content and high nutritive value. Breeding. Breeding of Meadow Voles takes place in all seasons, although it only occurs in winter when populations are at high densities. Woodland populations of Meadow Voles had lower reproductive rates and lower adult survival than grassland populations. Gestation is c.21 days. Females can have up to ten litters/year. Litters have 1-11 young (average 4-6). Young are born hairless and pink. Fur begins to appear at c.4 days old, and young are covered with juvenile fur at c.7 days old. Eyes and ears open at c.8 days old. Weaning occurs at 12-14 days old. Activity patterns. Meadow Voles are terrestrial and active day and night and throughout the year, with about a five-hour activity period/ day. Timing of activity has been related to temperature (if cold, more active during the day) and vegetative cover (if minimal, more active at night). Movements, Home range and Social organization. Home range of Meadow Voles is 405-3580 m? for males and 160-3115 m? for females. Males tend to disperse more in winter, and females disperse more in summer. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Subspecies chihuahuensis has not been recorded in recent years and is of conservation concern. Populations of Meadow Voles are known to fluctuate widely every 2-5 years, and hypotheses to explain this have been related to habitat quality, predation, secondary plant compounds, climate variability, stress due to high population densities, and other factors. Bibliography. Ambrose (1973), Bradley, Ammerman et al. (2014), Cassola (2016j), Getz (1961b), Grant (1975), Hsu & Benirschke (1967), Keys & Van Soest (1970), Ostfeld & Canham (1993), Reich (1981), Seabloom (1965), Tamarin (1977a), Van Vleck (1969).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0910.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict ZonesFrench-language works237,207