Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zodarion rubidum Simon 1914 (Figs 80–84) Material examined.— Canada: Québec: SainteAnnedeBellevue, Morgan Arboretum [45°27’N, 73°57’W] 21.vii.2003, Macdonald campus Agricultural farm, disturbance AGRC3, pitfall, 1ɗ, C. Buddle (LEM) Diagnosis.— Both sexes are recognised by the anterior median eyes (AME) being twice the diameter of other eyes (Figs 80–81). Males are characterised by the palp bearing modified apical setae on the cymbium (arrow, Fig. 82) and the shape of the RTA (Fig. 83). Females are recognised by the weakly sclerotized epigynal plate (Fig. 84), and the configuration of the copulatory openings (CO) (Fig. 84). Distribution.— Palearctic. May be introduced into North America. The species is known only from isolated records in Colorado, Pennsylvania and Québec (present record) (Ubick & Craig 2005). Remark.— The establishment of the species in Québec remains uncertain. This record however suggests that it could be a resident of the East Coast. This species is the only Zodariidae known from the east Coast of North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".