Resource Usage of Applications Running on Raspberry Pi Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The collection and construction of this dataset were organized by the Queen's Telecommunications Research Lab (TRL) and led by Ruslan Kain, a Ph.D. student at TRL. The dataset includes dynamic resource usage information associated with running edge-native applications on a set of four heterogeneous Raspberry Pi 4 Devices. The four Raspberry Pi 4 devices have 2, 4, and 8 GB RAM sizes, and CPU frequencies of 1200, 1500, and 1800 MHz. This is to establish heterogeneity of the devices used and collected data and to enable data-based applications for Edge Computing Research. The resource usage measurements have a five-second granularity. We managed to collect more than 550 thousand unique data points representing the 768 hours of running applications on Raspberry Pi Devices. Our dataset is publicly available on the Borealis platform in an effort to help other researchers in the field conduct edge computing resource usage analysis. The dataset size is around 444 MB, consisting of 74 comma-separated values (CSV) files. Check the README file for the full details on the structure and content of the dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".