Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acineta foetida Maupas, 1881 (Fig. 2E) Material examined: Several specimens on pelagic ostracods Cypridina dentata (Müller, 1906) from station 16. Brief Description: Suctorian ciliate with a triangular or trapezoidal, somewhat asymmetric body attached to the bottom of the lorica. The lorica is triangular or trapezoidal, asymmetric, often with transverse folds of irregular shape, usually located in its lower part. Stalk short, its length does not exceed the length of the body. There is the stalk extension (basal disk) in the zone of stalk-lorica connection, which can be immersed in the base of the lorica. The stalk is attached to the substrate by means of an attachment disk. Tentacles arranged in two apical bundles, actinophores poorly developed, sometimes absent. Macronucleus is rounded, central. Above the macronucleus single contractile vacuole positioned. Measurements from present find: (measurements taken from 3 individuals; in μm) lorica length 32–40; lorica width 32–34; lorica thickness 16; size of macronucleus 10–16×11–13; length of tentacles 7–37; stalk length 6–15; stalk diameter 4; basal disk diameter 11. Host and substrate specificity: Ubiquitous marine and brackish-water species, observed on inanimate substrates, algae, but often found on representatives of crustacean (Dovgal 2013). The species was observed on representatives of crusracean orders, eg. (Dovgal 2013), on Amphipoda— Gammarus olivii Milne-Edwards, 1830, G. subtipicus Stock, 1966, Pontogammarus maeoticus (Sowinsky, 1894) and Orchestia bottae Milne-Edwards, 1840; Isopoda— Sphaeroma serratum (Fabricius, 1787), S. pulchellum (Colosi, 1921) and Idotea baltica basteri (Pallas, 1772); Decapoda— Palaemon elegans Rathke, 1837, Crangon crangon (Linnaeus, 1758), Diogenes pugilator (Roux, 1829), Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823 and Eriphia verrucosa (Forskal, 1775); Ostracoda— Cypridina dentata (Müller, 1906) (present report). Distribution: Widespread found in the Mediterranean, North, Baltic, Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, on the Pacific coast of Canada and the Atlantic coast of Mexico (Dovgal 2013); the Arabian Sea (Present report). Remarks: Acineta foetida was registered as epibiont on benthic or meiobenthic organisms only. Our finding is a first registration of this species on planktonic marine Ostracoda.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".