Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arachnoscelis Karny 1911 Karny. 1911. Verh. der Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellsch. Wien 61: 334–347 Karny. 1912. Genera Insectorum 131:3 Bruner, L. 1915. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 9 (3–4):363 Randell. 1964. Canadian Ent. 96:1608 Gorochov. 1995 [1994]. Zoosystematica Rossica 3(2):202 Otte, D. 1997. Orthoptera Species File 7: 80 Nickle. 2002. J. Orth. Res. 11 (2):127 Gorochov. 2007. Zoosystematica Rossica 16 (2): 210 Gorochov. 2012. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta 316(4):287 Redescription of the genus. Head elongated in males. Male mandibles well developed, mandible elongated. Head, and mandibles of the female of normal appearance (Fig. 2). Males and females with notoriously large maxillary palps. Legs: Fore tibia distally decurved with 5 pairs of movable spines on the ventral surface (Fig. 3); tympanal area on the proximal part of fore tibia inflated, with a pair of tympanal openings that are antero-distally elongated, spacious, and asymmetrical; the anterior opening is narrower than the posterior one. Distal margin of both tympanal openings rounded, proximally this margin is acute. Wings: Male brachypterous, tegmina reduced to the size of the stridulatory area (Figs. 1 A, and 4A–E). Massive vein (formed by the merging of several veins), curves towards the anal area, ends blunt and weakly connects to CuPaa2 through the narrow handle vein (h in Fig. 4 E) and vein CuPaa2+CuPaß. The wing shows a large soft area between M+CuA end and CuPaa2 (Fig. 4 E). Tympanal slits elongated, relatively broad and asymmetrical (Fig. 5 A). Scraper area subquadrate, as large as the mirror area. Genitalia: Male subgenital plate broad with a broad v-shape notch, with two distinct styli. Female subgenital plate elongated, upturned, with distal bifurcation (Fig. 5 B).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".