MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912838527 · doi:10.5284/1127336

A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire: Brampton South Landscape Block Archaeology Report, Specialist Reports: Finds

2024· article· en· W6912838527 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeology and ancient environmental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavationBlock (permutation group theory)Work (physics)Stripping (fiber)South east

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fieldwork: The total excavated area of the Brampton South Landscape Block was 5.83 hectares: 3.63ha in TEA 10B East and 2.2ha in TEA 13. TEA 10B East was stripped and archaeologically investigated due to its location within a landscape of Iron Age, Romano-British and early medieval settlements. This TEA encompassed a narrow corridor for the realignment of Grafham Road/Brampton Road south of Lenton Lakes. Stripping of the site took place between March and April 2017 with hand excavation continuing until June 2017. Fieldwork within TEA 10B East followed the methodology set out in the Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) (Highways England 2015). TEA 13 was designated as a 'Targeted Excavation Area' based on features identified in the geophysical survey and aerial photography. This TEA was intended for mineral extraction with a spoil store on the eastern side, subsequently used as a pond. This designation was not communicated to the construction team resulting in parts of the TEA (to the east, south and west) being impacted by construction before the archaeological work had taken place. A small area (0.6ha) to the west was excavated in March 2017. A larger area surrounding this had been impacted by construction, but two ditches were observed and recorded. The remaining area of TEA 13 (1.6ha) was stripped in June 2017 with hand excavation taking place between June and August 2017. All works were undertaken in accordance with the Written Scheme of Investigation (Atkins CH2M, 2016) and metal detection was undertaken across both TEAs after stripping of the topsoil. The WSI stipulated the proportion of features to be excavated - 50% of discrete features; 20% of non-structural linear features; and 100% of structural features. Post-excavation: The preliminary grouping and stratigraphic sequencing of features presented in the Post-Excavation Assessment report (MHI 2019a) is superseded here. Stratigraphic information recorded on site has been complemented by the pottery and radiocarbon dates to provide a more detailed understanding of the chronology of the archaeology within the Brampton South Landscape Block. In this report, archaeological features have been grouped and assigned to periods using standardised terms and numeration in line with scheme-wide methodology for the stratigraphic analysis using QGIS (MHI 2020). Chronological periods referred to in this report are based on the established period divisions used in Cambridgeshire and beyond and in consultation with our pottery specialists. Where necessary, some features have been subgrouped to provide a more detailed understanding of specific features. Many features have also been assigned to a 'land use' and/or settlement which has enabled detailed analysis and comparisons of archaeological sites across the landscape blocks. The Brampton South landscape block comprised two Targeted Excavation Areas (TEAs) covering 5.83 hectares, situated approximately 400m apart. The archaeological evidence from the landscape block ranged from the late Bronze Age-early Iron Age to the 19th century, with the focus of activity concentrated in the middle to late Iron Age. The earliest feature within the landscape block was a late Bronze Age-early Iron Age pit alignment which crossed TEA 13 from the north-west to the south-east. Two middle to late Iron Age settlements were identified in the Brampton South landscape block. Settlement 1 was focused on TEA 10B East and comprised three roundhouses, two enclosures, cooking pits, wells, waterholes and a series of ditches forming a field system. Settlement 2 in TEA 13 comprised three roundhouses, a D-shaped enclosure, a rectangular enclosure with an annexe, and a 'ladder' field system. Later activity was characterised by medieval agricultural furrows, which were present across both TEAs, two areas of post-medieval quarrying within TEA 13, and 19th century field boundaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207