MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912842291 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6760883

Mesophylla macconnelli Thomas 1901

2019· article· en· W6912842291 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumWhite (mutation)SkullUpper lipSeta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

162. MacConnell’s Bat Mesophylla macconnelli French: Vampyresse soufrée / German: MacConnell-Fledermaus / Spanish: Murciélago de MacConnell Taxonomy. Mesophylla macconnelli Thomas, 1901, “Kanuku Mountains, about 59° W. and 3° N. ... 2000 feet [= 610 m],” Upper Takutu-Upper Essequibo, Guyana. Mesophylla macconnelli was considered a species of Vampyressa, but recent morphological and molecular studies demonstrate distinctions between Mesophylla and Vampyressa. Monotypic. Distribution. Central America from Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama to Colombia, Venezuela, the Guianas, Brazil, Ecuador, E Peru, and N Bolivia; also on Trinidad I. Descriptive notes. Head-body 45-49 mm (tailless), ear 9:-5-13-5 mm, hindfoot 8-12 mm, forearm 29-5-34 mm; weight 6-8 g. MacConnell’s Batis very delicate and among the smaller species in the family. Dorsal fur is thick, pale gray-brown or pale gray, getting darker toward back; hairs are tricolored, with pale brown bases, whitish middles, and pale brown tips. There is no white stripe along back. Ventralfur is evenly buffy gray. White facial stripes are indistinct or absent. Noseleaf is simple, bright yellow, medium-sized, and rough-edged,;if laid forward, there is a second tiny noseleaf. Ears and noseleaf are bright yellow, with brownish tinge on upper parts of ears. Wing membrane is “mummy brown.” Tragus is pointed, with lobes that project externally on to front. There is a supplementary lobe on antitragus. Forearm,fingers, and thumbs are yellowish pink. Plagiopatagium extends to distal part of metatarsal, attached to curved calcar. Tail membrane is pale brown and short. Dental formulais12/2, C1/1,P 2/2, M 2/3 (x2) = 30. Premolars are delicate and evenly spaced. Skull is relatively small and fragile. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 21/22 and FN = 18. MacConnell’s Bat has a XXXX,/ XX,Y system, with the Y-chromosome translocated to the autosomes. Habitat. Evergreen forests, rainforests (secondary), and commonly lowlands with numerous palms. MacConnell’s Bat has a clear affinity for tropical humid forests. Food and Feeding. MacConnell’s Bat is mainly frugivorous. In French Guiana, one of seven individuals had pollen in addition to fruits in its fecal samples. Breeding. Female MacConnell’s Bats with young use the same roost until young reach adulthood. Females often change roosts. Pregnant females have been captured in January—March andJuly-September, suggesting bimodal polyestry as in other stenodermatines. Activity patterns. MacConnell’s Bat is nocturnal and makes tents for roosting. In French Guiana, leaf tents were made of bifid terminal leaflets of palm (Astrocaryum, Arecaceae) fronds in well-drained primary forests. Tents have also been found in a species of Cyclanthaceae and apical type tents in Anthurium (Araceae) and Geonoma (Arecaceae). MacConnell’s Bats also roost in hollow trees. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Groups of MacConnell’s Bats have 3-8 individuals, including lactating females, young, and 1-2 adult males. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Bibliography. Arroyo-Cabrales (2008a), Gomes et al. (2016), Goodwin & Greenhall (1962), Hoofer & Baker (2006), Kunz & Pena (1992), LaVal & Rodriguez-Herrera (2002), Reid (2009), Rodriguez-Herrera et al. (2007), Simmons & Voss (1998), Starrett & Casebeer (1968).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→