MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912845368 · doi:10.5284/1099623

St. Mary's Church, Walkern. Archaeological Monitoring

2016· article· en· W6912845368 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcavationAssemblage (archaeology)ToiletHuman skeletonHuman boneRight of way

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the faculty requirements for a new internal toilet and kitchen facilities at St Marys's Church, Walkern, Hertfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned to undertake a programme of archaeological monitoring. The present groundworks, which consisted of a single drainage run to connect a new internal toilet to the existing drain on Church End, resulted in an extremely long excavation around three sides of the church within the churchyard. The extent of this excavation and the depth to which the new drain had to be placed meant that human remains were inevitably encountered. While a large quantity of disarticulated human bone was revealed as would be expected within a graveyard, a total of 10 articulated skeletons were also identified, some of which were clearly in defined graves. An assessment of the articulated human remains demonstrated a mixture of sexes and ages. While the sample size was small due to the nature of the excavation and archaeological constraints meant no full skeleton could be excavated, the assemblage demonstrated nothing that would not be expected within a standard village church cemetery

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.162
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1620.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207