MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912855209 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7003363

Copelatus masculinus Regimbart 1899

2022· article· en· W6912855209 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstarDorsumLarvaMargin (machine learning)Table (database)Capsule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copelatus masculinus Régimbart, 1899 Source of material. The five instar II and five instar III larvae studied were reared ex ovo from adults collected at the following locality: Japan. Tarumai-shitsugen, Yonaguni-cho Yonaguni-jima Island, Okinawa Prefecture, 24°26’31.2’’N 122°58’06.2’’E, 17.VI.2018; K. Watanabe leg. Diagnosis (instar III). The third instar of Copelatus masculinus can easily be distinguished from that of the other species studied in this paper by the following combination of characters: HL = 1.00 mm; L3 <2.00 mm; U <0.40 mm; head capsule rounded, slightly constricted at level of occipital region (Fig. 25), scale-like sculpticels present over frontoclypeus and parietale; anterior margin of frontoclypeus narrowly convex, extending mesally slightly beyond adnasalia (Fig. 25); adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded teeth (Fig. 64); MP2/MP1> 1.50; GA/MP1> 1.50; LP2/LP1 <1.10; inner margin of stipes lacking a dorsal linear row of spinulae; profemur with less than 3 PV and 4 AV secondary setae; metafemur with less than 3 AV secondary setae; urogomphus composed of two urogomphomeres; U/HW <0.40; U/LAS <0.50; Oriental and Palaearctic. Description, instar II Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 4. Head: Head capsule rounded, slightly constricted at level of occiput; anterior margin of frontoclypeus narrowly convex, extending mesally slightly beyond level of adnasalia; scale-like sculpticels well-developed over frontoclypeus and parietale; adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded teeth (see Fig. 64); HL = 0.68–0.72 mm; A/MP = 1.33–1.36; MP/LP = 1.99–2.07; MP2/MP1 = 1.62–1.72; GA/MP1 = 1.92–2.13; LP2/LP1 = 1.33–1.55; MNL/MNW = 2.83–3.33. Thorax: L3 = 1.32–1.42 mm. Abdomen: LAS = 0.46–0.54 mm; LAS subcylindrical to subconical, not constricted posteriorly at point of insertion of urogomphi. Urogomphus: U = 0.23–0.25 mm, composed of two urogomphomeres; U/HW = 0.32–0.34; U/LAS = 0.46–0.51. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 5–7 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Table 5. Description, instar III (Figs 25–27, 64). As second-instar larva except as follows: Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 6. Head (Figs 25, 27, 64): HL = 0.97–0.99 mm; A/MP = 1.34–1.37; MP/LP = 2.04–2.14; MP2/MP1 = 1.51–1.65; GA/MP1 = 1.61–1.85; LP2/LP1 = 1.06–1.12; MNL/MNW = 2.84–2.92. Thorax: L3 = 1.90–2.00 mm. Abdomen (Fig. 26): LAS = 0.75–0.77 mm; U = 0.31–0.32 mm, U/HW = 0.29–0.31; U/LAS = 0.40–0.43. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 7–9 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Table 7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology→French-language works237,207→