Asplenium rhizophyllum Linnaeus 1753
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<b>Asplenium rhizophyllum</b> Linnaeus, <i>Species Plantarum</i> 2: 1078. 1753. "Habitat in Jamaica, Virginia, Canada, Sibiria." RCN: 7827. Lectotype (designated here by Reveal): <i>Kalm</i>, Herb. Linn. No. 1250.1 (LINN; iso- BM). Current name: <i> <i>Asplenium rhizophyllum</i> L. (Aspleniaceae).</i> <i>Note:</i> Maxon (in <i>Contr. U. S. Natl. Herb.</i> 10: 482-484. 1908) discussed the original material and concluded that the name should apply to the element from Virginia. While noting the existence of Kalm material (1250.1 LINN), he did not refer to it as the type. Ewan (in <i>Amer. Fern. J.</i> 53: 141. 1963) noted that a Banister description and drawing contributed to Linnaeus’ knowledge of this taxon (and reproduced the original drawing and Plukenet’s copy, as his pl. 10).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".