MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912867156 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8290033

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) nanotegula Landaverde-González & Gardner & Moo-Valle & Quezada-Euán & Ayala & Husemann 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6912867156 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaxonEtymologyDifferential diagnosisDifferential (mechanical device)Seta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) nanotegula Landaverde-González & Husemann sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 907458CF-52CC-464C-A761-66B9373D5153 Figs 6H, 20–21, 25B, 26B, 27B, 34B Diagnosis Females of L. (D.) nanotegula sp. nov. can be recognised by the diagnostic combination of tegula small, ovoid (tegula width/ITS <0.20), and impunctate; frons punctures much finer and denser than those of lower paraocular area; head broader than long (length/width0.91–0.95); mesoscutum moderately sparsely punctate between parapsidal lines (i = 1–3 pd), becoming dense but not crowded laterad of parapsidal lines (i ≤ 1 pd); metapostnotum shiny to weakly tessellate with strong coarse rugae reaching posterior margin; and T1–T3 apical impressed areas evenly covered with fine sparse punctures (i = 1–3 pd) with short simple setae arising from them (except absent on T1 medially). Males can be recognised by the same characters (however, the single male available for study is missing the metasoma, so metasomabased diagnostic characters are uncertain); in addition, males have the paraocular area and lower frons with dense appressed tomentum. Differential diagnosis Females of L. (D.) nanotegula sp. nov. are most similar to those of L. (D.) milpa sp. nov. and L. (D.) ameshoferi sp. nov. For comparison with Lasioglossum (D.) ameshoferi see above in L. (D.) ameshoferi differential diagnosis; however, the male of that species is unknown. For comparison with L. (D.) milpa see above in L. (D.) milpa differential diagnosis. Etymology The specific epithet ‘ nanotegula ’ is a combination of the Latin nouns ‘ nanus ’ (‘dwarf’) and ‘ tegula ’ (‘roof tile’, literally ‘covering instrument’, now applied to the sclerite covering the wing base). It refers to the small size of the tegula. Type material Holotype MEXICO – Yucatán • ♀; Mérida, 15 km S of University of Yucatán; [20.83° N, 89.62° W]; 7 Apr. 1997; R.W. Brooks leg.; ex Piscidia piscipula; SEMC SM0105925. Paratypes GUATEMALA – Huehuetenango • 1 ♀; Jacaltenango, San Andrés; 15.7167° N, 91.7455° W; elev. 1027 m; 28 Feb. 2010; Miguel Cigarroa leg.; ECOAB.43341 • 1 ♀; La Democracia, Camojaíto; 15.616° N, 91.8727° W; elev. 940 m; 1 Mar. 2010; Daniel Sánchez leg.; ECOAB.43336 • 1 ♀; San Antonio Huista, Pinalito; 15.6653° N, 91.8618° W; elev. 963 m; 2 Mar. 2010; Jaime Florez leg.; ECOAB.43339. MEXICO – Chiapas • 1 ♀; Arriaga, Ej. Adolfo López Mateos; 16.3463° N, 93.9741° W; elev. 367.5 m; 17 Jul. 2009; Carlos Balboa, Miguel Guzmán and Miguel Cigarroa leg.; ECOAB.53487 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 17 Nov. 2009; ECOAB.53350 • 1 ♀; Arriaga, Paraje, Poza Verde; 16.3428° N, 93.952° W; elev. 465.5 m; 14 Mar. 2009; Carlos Balboa, Miguel Guzmán and Miguel Cigarroa leg.; ECOAB.53314 • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 15 Jul. 2009; ECOAB.53483 • 2 ♀♀; La Trinitaria, Carretera 190; 16.0424° N, 92.0179° W; elev. 1041 m; 15 Feb. 2014; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.53398, ECOAB.53399 • 1 ♀; Mapastepec, El Unión Los Olivos; 15.3083° N, 92.4738° W; elev. 315 m; 1 Apr. 2005; M. Rincón, Ricardo Ayala Barajas, R. Vandame and Miguel Guzmán leg.; ECOAB.43760 • 1 ♀; Ocosingo, El Rosario; 16.8859° N, 92.2742° W; elev. 1118 m; 11 Feb. 2010; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.43281 • 2 ♀♀; Ocosingo, Sibaca; 16.9447° N, 92.1839° W; elev. 1107 m; 12 Apr. 2010; Carlos Balboa leg.; ECOAB.43271, ECOAB.43331 • 1 ♀; San Juan Cancuc, Tzuluwitz; 16.894° N, 92.4019° W; elev. 1270 m; 6 Apr. 2010; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.43325. – Quintana Roo • 1 ♀; 12 km NW of Reforma; [18.89° N, 88.65° W]; 14 Oct. 1986; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC. – Yucatán • 1 ♂; same collection data as for holotype; SEMC SM0105924 (photographed) • 1 ♀; Tah Dziú; [20°10′06.9″ N, 88°55′36.2″ W]; 7 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 237; ZMH 842031 • 2 ♀♀; Uxmal Ruins, 16 km SW of Muna; [20.36° N, 89.77° W]; 14 Feb. 1987; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC. Other material examined MEXICO – Jalisco • 1 ♀; Chamela; [19.5° N, 105.04° W]; 26 Sep. 1985; R.J. McGinley leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 30 Sep. 1985; USNM • 2 ♀♀; Guadalajara; [20.65° N, 103.35° W]; J.C. Crawford leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; Mascota; [20.53° N, 104.79° W]; 17 Jul. 1989; R.J. McGinley leg.; USNM. – Yucatán • 1 ♂; Tah Dziú; 6 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 452b; ZMH 839503 • 1 ♀; Muna; [20°28′15.7″ N, 89°46′53.5″ W]; 22 Jul. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 570; ZMH 842054 • 1 ♀; Tixmehuac; [20°15′52.4″ N, 89°08′58.1″ W]; 15 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 410; ZMH 842034 • 1 ♀; Tixcuytun; [20°12′21.80″ N, 89°09′17.50″ W]; 7 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 488b; ZMH 842036 • 1 ♂; Xaya, [20°16′51.70″ N, 89°11′28.70″ W], 5 Aug. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 621c; ZMH 839508 • 1 ♀; Tixcuytun; [20°12′21.80″ N, 89°09′17.50″ W]; 7 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 493; ZMH 842037 • 1 ♀; Muna; [20°28′15.7″ N, 89°46′53.5″ W]; 22 Jul. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 569a; ZMH 842068 • 1 ♀; Yaxcopil; [20°4′4.10″ N, 88°54′23.80″ W]; 1 Aug. 2011; QuezadaEuán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 605b; ZMH 842069 • 1 ♀; Alfonso Caso; [20°05′02.5″ N, 89°09′39.3″ W]; 25 Oct. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 92; ZMH 842066. Floral records FABACEAE Juss.: Piscidia L.: P. piscipula (L.) Sarg. • SOLANACEAE Adans.: Capsicum L.: C. chinense Jacq. DNA barcodes Seventeen sequences available (BOLD process IDs: LDSPS040-15 to LDSPS051-15, LDSPS096-15, LDSPS097-15, LDSPS100-15 to LDSPS102-15). These sequences are highly variable (maximum intraspecific p-distance 1.3%; minimum interspecific distance, to L. aureoviride sp. nov., 3.96%). The other sequences not from Yucatán are much less variable, with a clear barcode gap (maximum intraspecific p-distance 0.2%; minimum interspecific distance, to L. nanotegula sp. nov., 4.4%). This species is a member of the informal L. comulum species group and corresponds to mOTU 4 in Landaverde-González et al. (2017a). Description Female (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Length 4.45 mm; head length 1.21 mm; head width 1.33 mm; fore wing length 2.93 mm. Six female paratypes measured: length 4.25–4.46 mm; head length 1.15–1.21 mm; head width 1.21– 1.33 mm; fore wing length 2.91–2.94 mm. COLOUR. Head and mesosoma metallic blue-green to olive green; clypeus apical half black; supraclypeal area with golden reflection; scape and pedicel black, F1–F10 black, F8–F10 becoming brown ventrally; wing membrane subhyaline, subcosta dark brown, venation and pterostigma otherwise light brown; legs dark brown with distitarsi light brown; metasoma dark brown with rims of terga and sterna lighter reddish brown. PUBESCENCE. Dull white. Head and mesosoma with abundant long setae (1–2.5 OD); lower paraocular area and gena with sparse subappressed tomentum; propodeum with abundant plumose setae on lateral and posterior surfaces (2 OD); T1 with with dense complete setose fan; T2–T3 with small basolateral patches of appressed tomentum covering less than half length of segment laterally; disc of T4 with sparse appressed tomentum throughout; T1–T5 evenly covered with dense, short, simple setae, about half as long on T1–T2, becoming long and plumose laterally (1–2.5 OD); tibia and tarsal segments with plumose light-yellow setae. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus shiny and densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); supraclypeal area shiny and moderately sparsely punctate (i = 1–2 pd); paraocular area and antennocular area shiny and very densely punctate (i <0.5 pd); upper paraocular area and frons with fine crowded punctures (i = 0 pd); gena and postgena shiny; mesoscutum moderately sparsely punctate between parapsidal lines (i = 1–3 pd), becoming dense and crowded laterad of parapsidal lines (i ≤ 1 pd); mesepisternum imbricate and densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); metapostnotum shiny to weakly tessellate, with strong coarse rugae reaching posterior margin; propodeum with lateral surface and posterior surface weakly tessellate; T1– T3 minutely, sparsely punctate (i = 1–3 pd); T1 apical impressed area impunctate medially. STRUCTURE. Head wide (length/width ratio = 0.91–0.95; holotype = 0.91); eyes weakly convergent below (UOD/LOD ratio = 1.23–1.28; holotype = 1.23); clypeus ⁴/5 below suborbital tangent; antennal sockets close (IAD/AOD <0.52); frontal line ending> 2.5 OD below median ocellus; head broader than long (length/width 0.91–0.95); gena narrower than eye; inner metatibial spur with three teeth; tegula small, ovoid, not produced mesally (tegula width/ITS <0.215); scutellum length 0.28; metapostnotum length 0.22, metapostnotum elongate (MMR ratio = 1.27), posterior margin rounded onto posterior surface; propodeum with oblique carina straight and lateral carina not reaching margin of dorsal surface. Male MEASUREMENTS. Length 3.58 mm; head length 1.05 mm; head width 1.09 mm; fore wing length 2.57 mm. COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma metallic blue-green; scape and pedicel dark brown; F1–F10 dark brown dorsally, light brown ventrally; legs dark brown with tibial bases, apices, and tarsi light brown. PUBESCENCE. Dull white. Head and mesosoma with abundant plumose short setae (0.5–2 OD); paraocular area and lower frons with dense appressed tomentum; clypeus, supraclypeal area, and gena with sparse appressed tomentum; propodeum with abundant plumose setae on lateral and posterior surfaces (1–2 OD); S3–S5 pubescence short (1–2 OD), suberect, and weakly plumose, appearing simple at <40 × magnification; tibia and tarsal segments with plumose light-yellow setae. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus shiny and sparsely punctate (i = 1–3 pd); supraclypeal area shiny and moderately sparsely punctate (i = 1–2 pd); lower paraocular area and antennocular area shiny and densely punctate (i <1 pd); upper paraocular area and frons shiny with crowded punctures (i = 0 pd); ocellocular area shiny and densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); gena and postgen

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207