MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912867373 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5968533

Tetranema furcata Fraser 1937

2018· article· en· W6912867373 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueen (butterfly)West coastType (biology)Type localityNorth west

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tetranema furcata Fraser, 1937a Tetranema furcata Fraser, 1937a: 193, pl. 44, figs. 233a–e. Astrolabia furcata.— Schuchert, 1997: 151. Syntypes. BCPM 976-00948-001: Canada, British Columbia, Queen Charlotte Islands (=Haida Gwaii), Moresby Island, Kaison Bank, 28 July 1936, 201 m, two colonies, labelled "type"; 60% IPA. BCPM 976-00948-002: Canada, British Columbia, Queen Charlotte Islands (= Haida Gwaii), Moresby Island, Kaison Bank, 28 July 1936, one colony; slide. Lectotype, by present designation. RBCM 976-00948-003: Canada, British Columbia, Queen Charlotte Islands (= Haida Gwaii), Moresby Island, Kaison Bank, 201 m, 28 July 1936, one colony, 3.3 cm high, with one gonotheca, in good condition; 70% ethanol. Paralectotypes. BCPM 976-00948-001: Canada, British Columbia, Queen Charlotte Islands (=Haida Gwaii), Moresby Island, Kaison Bank, 201 m, 28 July 1936, one colony, 2.1 cm high, without gonothecae, in fair condition; labelled "type"; 60% IPA. BCPM 976-00948-002: Canada, British Columbia, Queen Charlotte Islands (= Haida Gwaii), Moresby Island, Kaison Bank, 28 July 1936, one colony, 1.3 cm high, with one gonotheca, in good condition; slide. Type locality. Canada, British Columbia: Queen Charlotte Islands (= Haida Gwaii), west coast of Moresby Island, Kaison Bank (Fraser 1937a). Current status. Valid, as Astrolabia furcata (Fraser, 1937a). Remarks. Although Fraser (1937a) designated no name-bearing type for Tetranema furcata, syntype material of the species exists at the RBCM. Two colonies were represented in fluid (BCPM 976-00948-001), with the larger one, in better condition and with a gonotheca, being designated here as the lectotype of the species. It was removed to a new bottle and assigned a new catalogue number (RBCM 976-00948-003). The smaller colony, sterile and in poorer condition, was returned to the original bottle as a paralectotype (BCPM 976-00948-001). A second paralectotype specimen occurs on a microscope slide (BCPM 976-00948-002). Although the slide is broken lateral to the mount, the hydroid colony is in good condition and bears a gonotheca. The original description of Tetranema furcata by Fraser (1937a) included accounts of both its trophosome and gonosome. With Tetranema Fraser, 1937a being an invalid junior homonym of Tetranema Haeckel, 1879, the specific name is now combined with a subjective synonym, Astrolabia Naumov, 1955, as A. furcata. The hydroid is reportedly amphi-Pacific in distribution, with A. heterotheca Naumov, 1955 from a depth of 576 m near Astrolabe Strait, Kuril Islands, Russia, being a subjective junior synonym (Antsulevich 2015).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicMarine Biology and Environmental ChemistryFrench-language works237,207