Megastilicus formicarius Casey 1889
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Megastilicus formicarius Casey, 1889 Fig. 1 Type material Lectotype (here designated) USA • ♂; “Drac. Mass. / Type USNM 38356 / Megastilus formicarius Csy ”; NMNH. Paralectotypes USA • 1 spec.; “Drac. Mass. / Casey bequest 1925 / formicarius-5 PARATYPE USNM 38356 ”; NMNH • 1 spec.; “Casey bequest 1925 / formicarius-2 PARATYPE USNM 38356 ”; NMNH • 1 spec. with ant; “Casey bequest 1925 / formicarius-3 PARATYPE USNM 38356 ”; NMNH • 1 ♂; “Mass / Casey bequest 1925 / formicarius-6 PARATYPE USNM 38356 ”; NMNH. Additional studied material USA • 1 spec.; “Pen Mar Pa”; NMNH • 1 spec.; “ Harrisonville Mo. / Aug 2015 ”; NMNH • 1 spec.; “ Cumberland Co. / Maine 1916”; NMNH • 1 spec.; “ Newark NJ”; NMNH • 1 spec.; “ Linell? Coll Chittenden ”; NMNH • 1 ♂; “ CypMills Tex / Coll Chittenden ”; NMNH • 1 spec.; “ Sherborn, Massachusetts / IV-5’-25 / C.A. Frost /John George Gehring collection”; MCZ • 1 spec. [with Formica exsectoides]; “Wickham collection 1933 / Iowa City / Wickham IV-24-98 ”; MCZ • 2 specs; “ Natick / V-12-12 / Mass”; MCZ • 9 specs; “ Drac. Mass / 4/4/-86 ”; MCZ • 1 spec. [with Formica exsectoides]; “ Newfoundl’d, N.J. / X.17.1913 / C.A. Frost / C.A. Frost Collection 1962”; MCZ • 1 spec.; “ Chocorua N.H. / 5-2-06 / F.C. Bowditch Collection ”; MCZ • 1 spec.; “ Palos Park / Ill. / 4.14.34 / c. Seevers”; AMNH • 1 spec.; “ Natik Mass. Frost. 12.5 / Massachusetts / N.am / Mus 8 crm”; AMNH • 1 spec.; “ Crawfordsville Ind. 4.XII.50 ”; AMNH. Diagnosis Head longer than wide.Antennomere 4 elongate. Teeth on labrum blunt. Eyes smaller than in M. iowaensis sp. nov., ca ⅙ of head length. Median emargination of posterior margin of sternum VIII deeper and broader than in M. iowaensis sp. nov. Redescription BODY. Colour of specimens from pale brown/sandy to brown (Fig. 1A–B). Head and tip of abdomen darker. Body length from tip of head to tip of abdomen 5.5–6.0. HEAD. Width 1.0–1.1, length 1.0–1.5. Antennomere 1 elongate, widest at tip; antennomeres 2 and 3 elongate; antennomere 4 weakly elongate; antennomeres 5 to 10 gradually becoming strongly transverse; antennomere 11 elongate, 1.5 × as long as antennomere 10. Antennomeres 1 and 2 sparsely pubescent; antennomeres 3 and 4 more densely pubescent, 5 to 11 densely covered with tomentose pubescence. Maxillary palpomere 2 short and slender, with only few setae, maxillary palpomere 3 slightly expanded towards apex with denser setation, maxillary palpomere 4 glossy. Eyes about ⅙ of head length, shifted anteriorly, ¼ to ⅕ of temple length. THORAX. Pronotum width 0.9–1.0, length 1.0–1.1. Elytra width 1.4–1.5, length 1.3–1.4. LEGS. Two long setae on outer margin of metacoxa. Seta closer to abdomen longer and thicker than seta more distant from abdomen. ABDOMEN. Sternum VII with apical margin straight. Tergum VIII with rounded posterior margin. Male with sternum VIII with moderately deep and broad median emargination of posterior margin; depth of emargination of ca ⅕ of sternum length; sides of emargination rounded (Fig. 1C); surface right anterior to emargination without setae, while margins with dense setation. AEDEAGUS. With ventral process in parameral view narrower in middle; lateral plates of internal sac fused to sides of median lobe and indistinctive (Fig. 1D–E). Occurrence The species has previously been recorded from the Canadian provinces of Manitoba, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Ontario and the following US states: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Ohio (A. Newton, unpublished database). New state records include: Missouri, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Texas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".