MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912893941 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8065319

Calocybe violacea T. Bau & L. S. Mu 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6912893941 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHymeniumPileusBasidiumBasidiocarpHyphaContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calocybe violacea T. Bau & L.S. Mu, sp. nov. (Figure 3a–b, Figure 4a–d). MycoBank: 846890 Diagnosis:—Differs from related species by its convex to applanate, purple to bluish-purple pileus, white lamellae, purple-black, bluish-purple to white stipe, and relatively larger basidiospores, pileipellis a cutis, hyphae light purple-brown, stipitipellis composed of hyphae light brown, light purple-brown and light purple. Etymology:—Refers to the blue-purple color on the cap and stipe of basidiomata. Holotype:— CHINA. Yunnan Province: Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Chuxiong, Lucheng Town, Haizi Dam, in a forest dominated by Quercus spp., elevation 1836 m, 101°57’E, 24°97’N, 30 November 2021, leg. Jianneng Zhao (HMJAU65324). Description:— Basidiomata small-sized. Pileus 2.5–3.5 cm diam., hemispherical, margin involute when young, becoming convex to applanate at maturity, surface dry, purple-black (18D5) to dark purple (17E8) at center, becoming purple (17C6) to bluish-purple (19A4) towards the margin; context white (19A1). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, crowded, L=50–60, I=1–3, white (19A1), edge entire. Stipe 4.5–7.5 × 0.5–1 cm, central, cylindrical, purple-black (18E5), purple (18C6), bluish-purple (19B6), blue (21A7) to white (19A1), with white pubescence at the base, fibrous. Odor faint. Spore deposit white. Basidiospores (5.7) 6.4–6.7 (7.6) × (2.6) 3.0–3.2 (3.4) μm, 6.5×3.1 µm on average, Q=1.86–2.46, Q m =2.12 ± 0.12, oblong, colorless, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, with oil droplets, cyanophilous, inamyloid. Basidia 15–24 × 5–7 μm, clavate, with oil droplet, with 4 (2) sterigmata, hyaline, smooth, thin-walled, with siderophilous granules. Hymenophoral trama regular, thin-walled, colorless, smooth, 4–11 μm wide. Cystidia absent. Pileipellis a cutis, hyphae 3–9 μm wide, light purple-brown after. Stipitipellis composed of thin-walled, 2–4 µm wide hyphae often light brown, light purple-brown, and light purple. Clamp connections present. Habit, habitat, and distribution: Gregarious, on soil in broad-leaved forests dominated by Quercus spp. Additional specimen examined: Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Chuxiong, Lucheng Town, Haizi Dam, in a forest dominated by Quercus spp., elevation 1836 m, 101°57’E, 24°97’N, 26 November 2021, Jianneng Zhao (HMJAU65325, paratype!).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions→French-language works237,207→