MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912909786 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6863414

Pygathrix nemaeus

2013· article· en· W6912909786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPrimate Behavior and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollarWhite (mutation)HolotypeOrange (colour)Forehead

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

122. Red-shanked Douc Pygathrix nemaeus French: Douc a pattes rousses / German: Rotschenkel-Kleideraffe / Spanish: Duc de patas rojas Other common names: Red-shanked Douc Langur, Red-shanked Douc Monkey Taxonomy. Simia nemaeus Linnaeus, 1771, Vietnam, “Cochin-China.” There is a small area of sympatry between P. nemaeus and P. cinerea in northern Quang Nam Province, Vietnam, and in north-eastern Cambodia (Virachey National Park), with some hybridization. Monotypic. Distribution. EC & SE Laos, N & C Vietnam (but very fragmented), and a small area in NE Cambodia (Voensei, Ratanakkiri Province). Old records from Hainan I appear to be erroneous. Descriptive notes. Head-body 55-63 cm (males) and 49-57 cm (females), tail 52— 66 cm (males) and 42-59 cm (females); weight 811-6 kg (males) and 6-8 kg (females). Coloration of the Red-shanked Douc is variable. Males and females are the same and have the typical features found in the species of Pygathrix. Back, crown, and upper arms are dark gray-agouti. Chest, belly, and throat are very pale whitish-gray. Below the white throat, a broad orange collar is bordered by a black line underneath that joins black parts on shoulders. Back of hands and forearms, nearly to elbows, are white; hands and feet are black. Upper legs are black, lower legs are chestnut from knees to ankles, and maroon hairs cover feet. Face is surrounded by white whiskers as long as 12 cm in adult males. A wide forehead band is black. Above base of tail is a triangular patch of white fur, which in males is further adorned by a pair of tufts at each anterior angle. Facial skin is orange to yellow-brown, except around mouth and chin, where it is white. Tail is white and has a thin tassel. Penis is pink, and scrotum is white. In a small area in north-eastern Cambodia and in the southernmost part of Laos, coloration of the Red-shanked Douc resembles that of the Gray-shanked Doucs (P. cinerea). White color on forearms is highly variable and in some individuals is reduced to small patches on wrists or completely missing. Forearms are gray-agouti. Maroon color on lower legs is also reduced to a reddish shine on gray-agouti legs. Natal coloration of the Red-shanked Douc is characterized by a light gray-agouti stripe on the back along the spine and white on the belly that extends over sides of the body to the back and to arms. Legs are light chestnut. From the forehead up to the crown, hairs are light chestnut; back of head is gray-agouti. Tail is whitish to grayish-white and has a thin tassel. There is a considerable variation in facial coloration, from a complete dark slate-gray face to more or less extended yellow patches under and over eyes, and to wider yellow eye-rings with only restricted gray parts around mouth, nose, and forehead. During the first five months oflife, forearms change to white, upper legs change to dark gray, and lower legs change to darker maroon. Chestnut color on head changes to gray, with a darker gray or blackish band over the forehead. Tail color changes to white. Slategray parts on face become paler over a long period of time, c.3 years, changing to the yellow-orange facial skin of adults. Habitat. Subtropical and tropical evergreen or semi-deciduous broadleaf forest, (classified as lowland and montane forest), karst formations, and occasionally mixed bamboo forest. Red-shanked Doucs are observed from sea level up to an elevation of 1600 m. They prefer high forest canopies but occasionally go to the ground for water or to eat minerals. Food and Feeding. The Red-shanked Douc is largely folivorous but also eats fruits and seeds. Its diet consists of ¢.80% leaves. Stomachs of 13 individuals contained 63% leaves and buds, along with flowers, fruits, and seeds. In Vietnam, 125 species of plants have been identified in the diet. Leaves are eaten from 83 species, fruits from 79, bark from five, and roots from one species. Young leaves that are high in crude protein and low in fiber are preferred. On average, leaf intake per individual is 1700 g/day. Breeding. Male Red-shanked Doucs reach sexual maturity at 5-6 years old and females at 3-5-5 years. Females have 28-30day reproductive cycles, and their normally white genital area becomes suffused with red when sexually receptive and during pregnancy. A single young is born after a gestation of 180-190 days. Young are weaned at 9-16 months old, varying depending on whether or not the female has a new pregnancy. Interbirth intervals are 9-26 months. Infants are gray and ginger, with a mostly black face (mottled with pale pink). Allomothering appears to be common. Individuals have lived up to 25 years in captivity. Activity patterns. Red-shanked Doucs are diurnal and arboreal. There are feeding peaks in the morning and afternoon, with a long rest at midday. They spend ¢.44% of their day feeding (30% on leaves and 14% on fruits), 15% engaging in social activities including grooming and playing, 14% inactive, 12% resting, 10% traveling, and 5% engaging in other activities. The time budget of daily activities varies among groups with and without human disturbance. A disturbed group rests less (c.5% less) and travels more. Leaping and jumping are the most common form of locomotion; brachiating may also be used when traveling in the forest canopy, particularly if individuals are fleeing or immediately before they begin leaping. Arboreal quadrupedalism is another mode of travel, which is often used where trees have open branches. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Group structure of the Red-shanked Douc is either unimale—multifemale or multimale—multifemale, with 3-20 individuals/group (5-10 most common). The male-female ratio averages 1:2-4. Group composition estimated from several populations is 21% adult males, 51% adult females, 18% subadults, and 10% infants. Several groups sometimes travel and forage together for a while, forming bands of 50 or more individuals. A low-pitched growl is given as a threat, and there is also a short, harsh distress squeal. There is a specific “play face,” in which eyes are closed (exposing very blue eyelids). The characteristic fixed stare is actually a threat display, with an open-mouthed grimace being the corresponding gesture of submission, which is also used to initiate grooming. There is a pre-mating sexual signal given by both sexes, which consists of placing the jaw forward, raising eyebrows and then lowering them, and then shaking the head. Status and Conservation. CITES Appendix I. Classified as Endangered on The IUCN Red List. The Red-shanked Douc is protected in all the three countries where it occurs. The population in Laos is probably quite large and is, as such, the most important for Red-shanked Doucs. The largest populations occur in Nakai-Nam Theun and Hin Namno national biodiversity conservation areas. In Vietnam, it has declined significantly in recent decades because of hunting, logging, and the conversion ofits forests for coffee, rubber, and cashew plantations. Hunting is the major threat to Redshanked Douc, most often for subsistence and traditional Asian medicine. The population is highly fragmented. The largest population in Vietnam exists most probably in Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, with an estimated 1300 individuals. Smaller populations in Vietnam exist in Pu Mat Nature Reserve and Bach Ma National Park (Nghe An and Thua Thien Hue provinces) and Son Tra Nature Reserve (Danang Province). Bibliography. Ademmer (2002, 2003), Brockman (1976), Brockman & Lippold (1975), Byron & Covert (2004), Covert et al. (2004), Duckworth et al. (1999), Fooden (1996), Groves (2001), Haus (2008), Hick (1972), Jablonski (1995), Kavanagh (1972), Klumpe (2001), Kulcharoen & Utara (2010), Liedigk et al. (2012), Lippold (1977, 1981, 1998), Lippold & Vu Ngoc Thanh (1995, 2008), Mey (2010), Nadler & Streicher (2004), Nadler, Momberg et al. (2003), Nadler, Vu Ngoc Thanh & Streicher (2007), O'Brien (2006), Otto (2005), Pham Nhat (1993, 2002), Pham Nhat et al. (2000), Phiapalath & Suwanwaree (2010), Rawson & Roos (2008), Roos (2004), Roos & Nadler (2001), Roos et al. (2007), Ruempler (1998), Timmins & Duckworth (1999), Ulibarri (2006), Yeong et al. (2010).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPrimate Behavior and EcologyFrench-language works237,207