MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912913865 · doi:10.5443/11418

The organic carbon flux to Arctic margin sediments: redox tracers stable isotopes and biomarkers as proxies for change

2012· dataset· en· W6912913865 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Polar Data Network · 2012
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTotal organic carbonArcticSedimentBayCarbon cycleContinental marginStable isotope ratioCarbon fibersIsotopes of carbon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To date, sediment cores have been successfully collected, while aboard the CCGS Sir Wilfrid Laurier in July 2007, and the CCGS Louis S. St. Laurent in July, 2009. The suite of cores spans the continental shelf and slope at depths varying from 60 to 2000 m from the Bering and Chukchi Seas, to Barrow Canyon, to the Mackenzie Shelf, Davis Strait, Baffin Bay and Canadian Archipelago. The analysis of the samples is now completed and we are now working on the interpretation of results. There is a lot that can be learned from the sediment cores. So far, the results show strong differences in the sediments and organic carbon between different regions of the Arctic. Areas that are very productive with algae and the marine food web, like the North Water Polynya in northern Baffin Bay, have very different organic carbon cycles from areas near river mouths that are strongly influenced by the land. We plan to characterize each region in detail and also compare the regions to produce an overall picture of the organic carbon cycle in the Canadian Arctic continental margin. We will also identify if the organic carbon cycle has been affected by the climate-related changes already underway.of climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Polar Data NetworkFrench-language works237,207