Minuspio multibranchiata Berkeley 1927
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Minuspio multibranchiata Berkeley, 1927 Prionospio (Minuspio) multibranchiata Berkeley, 1927: 414, plate 1, fig. 1.— Mackie, 1984: 40 –45, fig. 3.— Maciolek, 1985: 365 –367: fig. 15.— Granados-Barba & Solís-Weiss, 1998: 115. Type locality. Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, intertidal. Type material. lost. Records. Mexico: Campeche, Yucatan (Granados-Barba & Solís-Weiss 1998). Ascensión Bay, Quintana Roo, Mexico (29°20´N, 84°44´W), 30 m. USA: Hutchinson Island, Florida (27º20.4´N, 80º13.1´W), 9.7 m (Maciolek 1985). Remarks. This species has a confused diagnosis and subjet to different interpretations. Foster (1971) placed it in synonymy with M. cirrifera. Mackie's figured material somewhat resembles M. lighti Maciolek (1985), but differs in that they have dorsal crests and a different prostomial shape. The best description of M. multibranchiata available is that of Maciolek (1985). She included material from Washington State, south of Nanaimo (type locality) in her description. The only question is whether her west and east coast USA material is conspecific. The record of this species for the Grand Caribbean is questionable. These records should be confirmed or described as new species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".