Eurymeros tumespiraculum Bhat 1980
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Eurymeros tumespiraculum Bhat 1980 (Figs 2 & 3) Eurymeros tumespiraculum Bhat 1980, Entomon 5(2): 157. Type locality. India: Himachal Pradesh: Dalhousie. Distribution. India: Himachal Pradesh. Material examined. India. 2♀; Himachal Pradesh, Chamba District, Dalhousie, 32.5387° N, 75.9710° E, 25 Sept. 2014; Ankita Gupta leg; (NIM), code— NBAIR /Brac/Alys/Eury/25914 (NIM). Redescription Female. Body length (including ovipositor) 5.4 mm (Fig. 2); fore wing length 4.6 mm. Colour. Head black; eyes grey; clypeus yellowish brown; mandibles yellowish with dark brown margins, median tooth dark brown; palpi off white; ocelli transparent; antenna with scape and pedicel yellowish brown remaining flagellum brown; mesoscutum dark reddish brown except black lateral sides and black median depression; scutellum and propodeum black; legs in general yellowish with fore and mid femora, tibiae and tarsi darker except hind femur with apical three fourth dark brown, basal one fourth pale yellow and extreme basal margin dark brown; hind tibia brown; wings hyaline with pterostigma dark brown; metasoma with T1 black, remaining tergites reddish brown dorsally and yellowish laterally; ovipositor brown. Head. Antenna 27 segmented, 0.8 × as long as body; scape 2.4 × as long as wide, F1 3.3 × as long as wide; F2 2.2 × as long as wide; F1 1.3× as long as F2; head transverse, ca. 1.4 × as wide as long in dorsal view, temple and vertex smooth and shiny (Fig. 3C), widest distance from eyes 1.8 × as long as eye dorsally; eye length 2.4 × temple in dorsal view; POL: OOL: OD (relative) = 10.9: 15.3: 7.8; malar space subequal to basal width of mandible; face setose, clypeus smooth, distinctly separated from face in colouration. Head 1.2 × as wide as long in frontal view (Fig. 3A). Mandible with a sharp protruding median tooth, lateral sides of tooth blunt (Fig. 3B). Mesosoma. Mesosoma (Fig. 3F) 1.6 × as long as wide in dorsal view, mesoscutum smooth with median oval depression situated little above the posterior margin in the apical half; notauli absent; scutellum, mesopleuron (Fig. 3D) and metapleuron smooth. Propodeum with median carina surrounded by deep crenulae forming two parallel submedian carinae in basal half, submedian carinae bifurcating in apical half; basal half smooth and shiny and apical half with irregular and prominent rugae/carinae appearing as wide reticulations. Wings (Fig. 3E). Fore wing 2.7 × as long as wide; pterostigma 5.5 × as long as wide, r arising before middle of pterostigma. Fore wing vein ratio: r:2-SR:3-SR:SR1 = 0.15: 0.46: 0.65: 1.38; 1-SR+M 0.43, not sinuate; 1Cu1: 2Cu1: m-cu – 0.06: 0.44: 0.30. Legs. Hind femur distinctly widened with 7 teeth (one large, 4 medium and two small) and one truncated protuberance (Fig. 3H), hind basitarsus 0.4 × as long as hind tibia. Ratio of hind femur: hind tibia: hind tarsus: hind basitarsus-1.4: 1.6: 1.4: 0.6. Metasoma. Metasoma elongated (Fig. 3G); T1 with irregular carinae giving rugose appearance, remaining tergites smooth; T1 1.2 × as long as broad apically (in dorsal aspect), T1 lateral length 0.7; relative median length (T2−T7) 0.49: 0.33: 0.28: 0.27:0.32: 0.09; ovipositor length 1.3 mm, subequal to hind femur in length.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".