MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912940498 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6818187

Eurymeros tumespiraculum Bhat 1980

2022· article· en· W6912940498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScapeScutellumSimple eye in invertebratesExcursionPedicelDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Eurymeros tumespiraculum Bhat 1980 (Figs 2 & 3) Eurymeros tumespiraculum Bhat 1980, Entomon 5(2): 157. Type locality. India: Himachal Pradesh: Dalhousie. Distribution. India: Himachal Pradesh. Material examined. India. 2♀; Himachal Pradesh, Chamba District, Dalhousie, 32.5387° N, 75.9710° E, 25 Sept. 2014; Ankita Gupta leg; (NIM), code— NBAIR /Brac/Alys/Eury/25914 (NIM). Redescription Female. Body length (including ovipositor) 5.4 mm (Fig. 2); fore wing length 4.6 mm. Colour. Head black; eyes grey; clypeus yellowish brown; mandibles yellowish with dark brown margins, median tooth dark brown; palpi off white; ocelli transparent; antenna with scape and pedicel yellowish brown remaining flagellum brown; mesoscutum dark reddish brown except black lateral sides and black median depression; scutellum and propodeum black; legs in general yellowish with fore and mid femora, tibiae and tarsi darker except hind femur with apical three fourth dark brown, basal one fourth pale yellow and extreme basal margin dark brown; hind tibia brown; wings hyaline with pterostigma dark brown; metasoma with T1 black, remaining tergites reddish brown dorsally and yellowish laterally; ovipositor brown. Head. Antenna 27 segmented, 0.8 × as long as body; scape 2.4 × as long as wide, F1 3.3 × as long as wide; F2 2.2 × as long as wide; F1 1.3× as long as F2; head transverse, ca. 1.4 × as wide as long in dorsal view, temple and vertex smooth and shiny (Fig. 3C), widest distance from eyes 1.8 × as long as eye dorsally; eye length 2.4 × temple in dorsal view; POL: OOL: OD (relative) = 10.9: 15.3: 7.8; malar space subequal to basal width of mandible; face setose, clypeus smooth, distinctly separated from face in colouration. Head 1.2 × as wide as long in frontal view (Fig. 3A). Mandible with a sharp protruding median tooth, lateral sides of tooth blunt (Fig. 3B). Mesosoma. Mesosoma (Fig. 3F) 1.6 × as long as wide in dorsal view, mesoscutum smooth with median oval depression situated little above the posterior margin in the apical half; notauli absent; scutellum, mesopleuron (Fig. 3D) and metapleuron smooth. Propodeum with median carina surrounded by deep crenulae forming two parallel submedian carinae in basal half, submedian carinae bifurcating in apical half; basal half smooth and shiny and apical half with irregular and prominent rugae/carinae appearing as wide reticulations. Wings (Fig. 3E). Fore wing 2.7 × as long as wide; pterostigma 5.5 × as long as wide, r arising before middle of pterostigma. Fore wing vein ratio: r:2-SR:3-SR:SR1 = 0.15: 0.46: 0.65: 1.38; 1-SR+M 0.43, not sinuate; 1Cu1: 2Cu1: m-cu – 0.06: 0.44: 0.30. Legs. Hind femur distinctly widened with 7 teeth (one large, 4 medium and two small) and one truncated protuberance (Fig. 3H), hind basitarsus 0.4 × as long as hind tibia. Ratio of hind femur: hind tibia: hind tarsus: hind basitarsus-1.4: 1.6: 1.4: 0.6. Metasoma. Metasoma elongated (Fig. 3G); T1 with irregular carinae giving rugose appearance, remaining tergites smooth; T1 1.2 × as long as broad apically (in dorsal aspect), T1 lateral length 0.7; relative median length (T2−T7) 0.49: 0.33: 0.28: 0.27:0.32: 0.09; ovipositor length 1.3 mm, subequal to hind femur in length.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207