Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oecetis inconspicua (Walker) Fig. 7 Leptocerus inconspicua Walker 1852: 71 (male, original description); Ross 1938: 24 –25 (synonyms); Betten & Mosely 1940 (male, redescription, lectotype, synonymy); Ross 1944: 242 (male, female, larva, pupa, synonymy, distribution); Hagen 1861: 275 –276 (redescribed as Molanna inconspicua); Denning 1947: 656 (distribution); Wolcott 1950: 93 (distribution); Flint 1964: 64 (male, female); Fisher 1966: 149 (catalog); Flint 1967a: 23 (synonymy); Flint 1967b: 174 (distribution); Bueno-Soria & Flint 1980: 213 (distribution); Flint 1981: 32; Flint 1991a: 97 (distribution); 1996: 421 (distribution); Blahnik et al. 2004: 5 (distribution); Paprocki et al. 2004: 13 (distribution). Setodes flaveolata Hagen 1861: 282 (male, female); Milne 1934: 19 (to synonymy); Ross 1938: 25. Setodes micans Hagen 1861: 283 (male, female); Milne 1934: 19 (to synonymy). Setodes sagitta Hagen 1861: 284 (female); Banks 1907: 46 (in Oecetina); Milne 1934: 19 (to synonymy); Betten 1934: 274. Oecetina parvula Banks 1899:215 (female); Milne 1934: 19 (to synonymy). Leptocerus flaveolatus Banks 1899: 214; Banks 1904: 213 (in Oecetina); Betten 1934: 269 (to Oecetis). Oecetina flavida Banks 1899: 216; Ulmer 1907: 144; Milne 1934: 19 (to synonymy). Oecetina inornata Banks 1907: 128; Milne 1934: 19 (to synonymy). Oecetina apicalis Banks 1907: 129 (male); Milne 1934: 19 (to synonymy); Betten 1934: 274. Oecetina antillana Banks 1938: 298 (male); Flint 1967a: 23 (lectotype, to synonymy). This species has been recorded from North and Central America, the West Indies, and northern South America. Here, it is recorded for the first time from Bolivia. Floyd (1995) provided sufficient evidence to support that O. inconspicua is a complex of species. The adults are very similar and difficult to distinguish, but the larvae are morphologically distinct. The differences between this species and O. excisa have been discussed above. Material examined. BOLIVIA: Lake Colorada, near Trinidad, 14°48'21S, 64°58'41''W, 16.xi.2002, (IML) ― 2 males, 5 females; Río Mocovi, near Trinidad, 14°44'27''S, 64°54'24''W, 12.xi.2002, (IML) ― 8 males, 3 females; Lake Belen, near Trinidad, 14°27'29''S, 64°51'41''W, 13.xi.2002, (CBF-UMSA) ― 2 males, 1 female; Río Itenez, Versalles, 12°39'42''S, 63°22'21''W, 04.v.2006, (IML) ― 2 males, 23 females; Río Blanco, Bella Vista, 13°16'29''S, 63°42'32''W, 06.v.2006, (CBF-UMSA) ― 1 male, 1 female; Lake California, near Bella Vista, 10.v.2006, (IML) ― 1 male. GUATEMALA: Panajachei, 20.viii.1965, P. J. Spangler. Det. Joaquin Bueno Soria (NMNH) ― 1 male Distribution. Bahamas, Bolivia (new record), Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Puerto Rico, U.S.A., Venezuela.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".