Glyptotendipes (Glyptotendipes) barbipes Staeger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glyptotendipes (Glyptotendipes) barbipes (Staeger) (Fig. 2 C–E) Material examined. CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, Gimli Government Wharf, 1 female, 1 male 24.vi.1969 & 9.ix.1969; Grand Rapids Government Wharf, 11 males, 28.vi.1969. The male imagines have 23–35, 29 (5) sensilla chaetica in apical half of ta1 of p2, none on p3. Hypopygium as in Fig. 2 C. One female has 98 sensilla chaetica at 0.25–0.80 of ta1 of p2, 103 sensilla chaetica at 0.20–0.80 of ta1 of p3. The female genitalia are illustrated in Fig 2 D, E (from Saether (1977 fig. 80 C–D) and described by Contreras- Lichtenberg (1996: 20). Distribution and ecology. The species is Holarctic and Oriental, but does not occur in Southern Europe and in North Africa. In North America it is found from Alaska and British Columbia to New Brunswick and New York and south to California, New Mexico and South Carolina (Townes 1945: 141, Oliver et al. 1990: 47, Saether & Spies 2004). The larvae live in puddles and ponds, in brackish waters an in saline inland waters (Lenz 1954 –62: 175, Fittkau & Reiss 1978: 432).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".