MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6912955333 · doi:10.5683/sp2/gzbtw3

Patterson Creek Pavilion - Integrated Project Dossier (2019)

2020· dataset· en· W6912955333 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPavilionBridge (graph theory)Queen (butterfly)Cultural heritageArchitecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Patterson Creek Park Pavilion was built by the Ottawa Improvement Commission in 1923. The Pavilion is currently used as a public washroom and storage space, while the park and surrounding area serves as a dog park. It is located along the Queen Elizabeth Driveway and Linden Terrace, next to the Rideau Canal. The land, along with the canal beside it, is now currently owned by the NCC. The Patterson Creek Pavilion is a recognized Federal Heritage Building, while the Rideau Canal adjacent to the pavilion is recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site. This report will address the potential historic and heritage value of the pavilion and the park, while simultaneously evaluating the state of the structure and its surrounding landscape. The park boundary that was used for the purpose of this report starts at the bridge along Queen Elizabeth Driveway and follows Patterson Creek on both sides of the creek until it reaches the bridge at O'Connor Street. One side of the park borders on the Linden Terrace, whereas the other side borders along private properties. The purpose of this dossier is to outline our recorded work contribution towards Patterson Creekand Pavilion. It will highlight ways in which the interaction between the public and the creek has added to the heritage value of the site. The information collected from the assessment will allow us to properly understand this heritage site as an important cultural landscape in Ottawa. This is the Integrated Project Dossier compiled by a group of undergraduate students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University for the CIVE3207 (ARCN4100) Historic Site Recording and Assessment course in 2019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→