MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912961894 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7257277

Retaining Roots While Hard Pruning Data: Context and Collaboration in Digitisation and Data Modelling in South Asia

2022· article· en· W6912961894 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeological Research and Protection
Canadian institutionsArthur B. McDonald-Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research Institute
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsDocumentationContext (archaeology)USableCultural heritageWork (physics)Historic siteField (mathematics)Key (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are large numbers of published (and unpublished) archaeological sites and monuments in South Asia, but much of the available documentation is not available in a digital format, and paper publication remains the default. Information about archaeological heritage varies in detail, and there is considerable variation in how archaeological sites are documented. This paper explores the work and challenges of the Mapping Archaeological Heritage in South Asia (MAHSA) project in digitising, modelling, re-interpreting, linking, and re-using non-digital archaeological data into a structured and standardised digital format using a common and unique controlled vocabulary, so that it may become findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable data. Working with partners in South Asia, the MAHSA project is compiling existing and published data (from published documents, reports, and surveys) to be published in an Open Access database (Arches platform), which can be used for research and preservation. New and previously undocumented sites identified through the analysis of historic maps, remote sensing, automated site detection methods, and field documentation will also follow the same data standards and recording methodology. Retaining context while delivering ‘cleaned’ usable data is a key challenge to this type of data modelling, and the meanings of the original source and context are inevitably subject to re-interpretation during this process. The project is working collaboratively between South Asian and international stakeholders, each bringing their own expectations of data use, management, and accessibility, in addition to navigating the post-colonial space in which the project operates. To ensure usability, different use cases scenarios have been identified and are being developed with collaborators and database end-users. We argue that through linking archaeological data to their original sources and following best practices in modelling techniques, we can remain faithful to the original context while incorporating any change and enhancements where data needs to be verified and updated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicArchaeological Research and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207